EASE-NL : cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Dutch version of the evaluation of ability to sing easily

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

D'haeseleer, Evelien
Leyns, Clara
Meerschman, Iris
Thyssen, Julie
Dewaele, Fee
Van Lierde, K.M. (Kristiane)

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Abstract

OBJECTIVES : The Evaluation of the Ability to Sing Easily (EASE) is a self-rating tool that is used to assess the singer's perceptions of the current singing voice status. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a Dutch translation of the EASE. METHODS : The original version of the EASE was translated and adapted to Dutch according to the recommendations of the Quality of Life Special Interest Group - Translation and Cultural Adaptation group. Subsequently, the questionnaire was individually completed by 70 singers with a mean age of 35.2 years before and after a singing activity, together with a demographic questionnaire and the Dutch Singing Voice Handicap Index 10 (SVHI-10-NL). Two groups of singers were included between September and June 2020: a group of healthy singers (n = 54) and a group of dysphonic singers (n = 16). Internal and external consistency, construct and criterion validity, test-retest and split-half reliability were calculated using Cronbach's alpha coefficients, Student's t-test, the paired Wilcoxon tests and Pearson correlation coefficients. Furthermore, the impact of sex and age and the diagnostic accuracy of the EASE-NL was measured using the Mann Whitney U-test, the One Way ANOVA and the Brown Forsythe ANOVA-test. RESULTS : The internal consistency of the EASE was considered good. For the external consistency, the Pearson correlation coefficient showed a positive correlation between the total score of the EASE-NL and the SVHI-10-NL. Dysphonic singers scored significantly higher compared to singers without voice problems and no differences were found between the pre and post singing condition in both groups. Pearson correlations coefficients showed a strong positive correlation between the test and retest condition and between the subscales. A ROC-curve analysis showed a cut-off score of 12.5, with a sensitivity level of 75.0% and a specificity level of 74.1%. No differences for sex and age were found. CONCLUSIONS : The original English version of the EASE was translated and validated in Dutch. The EASE-NL is found to be a valid and reliable self-reported tool to assess singer's perceptions of the current status of their singing voice.

Description

Keywords

Singing voice, Evaluation of the ability to sing easily (EASE), Self-perception, EASE-NL

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

D'haeseleer, E., Leyns, C., Meerschman, I. et al. 2025, 'EASE-NL : cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Dutch version of the evaluation of ability to sing easily', Journal of Voice, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 568.e19-568.e27, doi : 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.10.003.