dc.contributor.author |
Bishop, Tom R.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Griffiths, Hannah M.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ashton, Louise A.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Eggleton, Paul
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Woon, Joel S.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Parr, Catherine Lucy
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-11-24T04:19:38Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-11-24T04:19:38Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2021-01 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Pausas and Bond argue that there are three major pathways by which the carbon and nutrients assimilated by plants are recycled through ecosystems: microbial decomposition, vertebrate herbivory, and wildfires. This framework has three principles. First, that each pathway recycles nutrients into plant-available forms. Second, that each pathway is broadly equivalent in that they consume ‘biomass’. Third, that the dominance of each pathway varies under different environmental conditions. We welcome the reframing of terrestrial recycling pathways in this way, but have identified three areas where the ‘Three Pathways Framework’ could be built upon. |
en_US |
dc.description.department |
Zoology and Entomology |
en_US |
dc.description.librarian |
hj2022 |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
http://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/home |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Bishop, T.R., Griffiths, H.M., Ashton, L.A. et al. 2021, 'Clarifying terrestrial recycling pathways', Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 9-11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2020.09.005. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
0169-5347 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1872-8383 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1016/j.tree.2020.09.005 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/88466 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Elsevier |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Trends in Ecology and Evolution. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 9-11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2020.09.005. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Microbial decomposition |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Vertebrate herbivory |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Wildfires |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Terrestrial recycling pathways |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Herbivory |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Decomposition |
en_US |
dc.title |
Clarifying terrestrial recycling pathways |
en_US |
dc.type |
Postprint Article |
en_US |