Clarifying terrestrial recycling pathways

dc.contributor.authorBishop, Tom R.
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, Hannah M.
dc.contributor.authorAshton, Louise A.
dc.contributor.authorEggleton, Paul
dc.contributor.authorWoon, Joel S.
dc.contributor.authorParr, Catherine Lucy
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-24T04:19:38Z
dc.date.available2022-11-24T04:19:38Z
dc.date.issued2021-01
dc.description.abstractPausas and Bond argue that there are three major pathways by which the carbon and nutrients assimilated by plants are recycled through ecosystems: microbial decomposition, vertebrate herbivory, and wildfires. This framework has three principles. First, that each pathway recycles nutrients into plant-available forms. Second, that each pathway is broadly equivalent in that they consume ‘biomass’. Third, that the dominance of each pathway varies under different environmental conditions. We welcome the reframing of terrestrial recycling pathways in this way, but have identified three areas where the ‘Three Pathways Framework’ could be built upon.en_US
dc.description.departmentZoology and Entomologyen_US
dc.description.librarianhj2022en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/homeen_US
dc.identifier.citationBishop, T.R., Griffiths, H.M., Ashton, L.A. et al. 2021, 'Clarifying terrestrial recycling pathways', Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 9-11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2020.09.005.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-5347 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1872-8383 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.tree.2020.09.005
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/88466
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Trends in Ecology and Evolution. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 9-11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2020.09.005.en_US
dc.subjectMicrobial decompositionen_US
dc.subjectVertebrate herbivoryen_US
dc.subjectWildfiresen_US
dc.subjectTerrestrial recycling pathwaysen_US
dc.subjectHerbivoryen_US
dc.subjectDecompositionen_US
dc.titleClarifying terrestrial recycling pathwaysen_US
dc.typePostprint Articleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Bishop_Clarifying_2021.pdf
Size:
177.34 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: