Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
dc.contributor.author | Akah, J.N. (Josephine)![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Ajah, A.C. (Anthony)![]() |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-17T05:35:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-17T05:35:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-07-28 | |
dc.description.abstract | The authors aim in this article to show why it is extremely difficult to expect representatives of missionary religions to engage in productive interreligious dialogue. The article demonstrates how the imperative to convert, which is rooted in a sense of epistemic authority that one holds the best version of truth, precludes interreligious dialogue among religionists. The authors note, on the one hand, that the primary condition for any dialogue is that each of those involved come to the dialogue intellectually humble. On the other hand, the authors note that for missionary religionists to embrace intellectual humility requires a fundamental rethink of their claims of epistemological certainty and final epistemic authority. This implies abandoning the missionary mandate and witnessing built on a sense of intellectual certainty and pride. The authors therefore argue that intellectual humility is a necessary condition for productive interreligious dialogue. Because representatives of missionary religions claim certainty about the knowledge they espouse, what is paraded as interreligious dialogue is largely a myth. It will remain a mere concept that yields little to no tangible result unless these representatives embrace intellectual humility, which is more achievable within a secularist framework. CONTRIBUTION: This research contributes to the seemingly easy but difficult discourse and practice about interreligious dialogue. It brings to the limelight a more appropriate conception of dialogue in the context of interreligious dialogue, and explains how side-lining that conception empties the predominant practice of interreligious dialogue. This contribution is useful to HTS, which focuses on theological and religious studies, as well as critical study of religions. | en_US |
dc.description.department | New Testament Studies | en_US |
dc.description.uri | http://www.hts.org.za | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Akah, J.N. & Ajah, A.C., 2022, ‘Interreligious dialogue as a myth’, HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 78(1), a7706. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i1.7706. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0259-9422 (print) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2072-8050 (online) | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.4102/hts.v78i1.7706 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/88357 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | AOSIS | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2022. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. | en_US |
dc.subject | Interreligious dialogue | en_US |
dc.subject | Myth | en_US |
dc.subject | Intellectual humility | en_US |
dc.subject | Epistemic authority | en_US |
dc.subject | Secular | en_US |
dc.title | Interreligious dialogue as a myth | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |