Mapping potential connections between Southern Africa’s elephant populations

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Huang, Ryan M.
dc.contributor.author Van Aarde, Rudi J.
dc.contributor.author Pimm, Stuart L.
dc.contributor.author Chase, Michael
dc.contributor.author Leggett, Keith
dc.date.accessioned 2022-11-07T10:21:21Z
dc.date.available 2022-11-07T10:21:21Z
dc.date.issued 2022-09-11
dc.description DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT : Telemetry data cannot be shared publicly because they contain the locations of an endangered and highly poached species. The environmental and human data necessary for reproducing our results are available at: https://osf.io/eyanr/. Much of these data have also been published under Loarie et al (2009). en_US
dc.description SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL : S1 Table. Telemetry sample size. Table of the number of males and female elephants providing telemetry data broken down by conservation cluster of occurrences. Included are the major protected areas in each cluster. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275791.s001 en_US
dc.description S2 Table. Area of layer intersection. Table providing amount of area considered suitable within each country of interest for each data layer used in addition to the combined data. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275791.s002 en_US
dc.description S1 Fig. Map of suitable landscapes. High resolution map showing areas that are both environmentally suitable for elephants and currently experience low human activity. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275791.s003 en_US
dc.description S2 Fig. Distribution of slope across conservation clusters. Histogram of elephant telemetry points at various slopes for each metapopulation cluster. The red dashed line indicates the threshold (3°) of preference for suitability. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275791.s004 en_US
dc.description S3 Fig. Distance to rivers across conservation clusters. Accumulation curve of area within a conservation cluster as the distance increases away from rivers of varying flow orders. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275791.s005 en_US
dc.description 4 Fig. Distribution of crop probability across conservation clusters. Histogram of elephant telemetry points at various cropland probabilities for each metapopulation cluster outside of protected areas. The red dashed line indicates the threshold (25%) of preference for suitability. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275791.s006 en_US
dc.description S5 Fig. Distribution of human population density across conservation clusters. Histogram of elephant telemetry points at various human population densities for each metapopulation cluster outside of protected areas. The red dashed line indicates the threshold (25 people per km2) of preference for suitability. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275791.s007 en_US
dc.description S6 Fig. Elephant interactions with cattle. A) Histogram of elephant telemetry points at various cattle densities for each metapopulation cluster outside of protected areas. The red dashed line indicates the threshold (5 cattle per km2) of preference for suitability. B) A map of elephant telemetry points illustrating how spill over from protected areas leads to interactions with areas of high cattle density. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275791.s008 en_US
dc.description.abstract Southern Africa spans nearly 7 million km2 and contains approximately 80% of the world’s savannah elephants (Loxodonta africana) mostly living in isolated protected areas. Here we ask what are the prospects for improving the connections between these populations? We combine 1.2 million telemetry observations from 254 elephants with spatial data on environmental factors and human land use across eight southern African countries. Telemetry data show what natural features limit elephant movement and what human factors, including fencing, further prevent or restrict dispersal. The resulting intersection of geospatial data and elephant presences provides a map of suitable landscapes that are environmentally appropriate for elephants and where humans allow elephants to occupy. We explore the environmental and anthropogenic constraints in detail using five case studies. Lastly, we review all the major potential connections that may remain to connect a fragmented elephant metapopulation and document connections that are no longer feasible. en_US
dc.description.department Zoology and Entomology en_US
dc.description.librarian dm2022 en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Billiton, Conservation Foundation Zambia, Conservation International’s southern Africa’s Wildlife Programme, the Conservation Lower Zambezi, the International Fund for Animal Welfare, the Mozal Community Development Trust, the National Research Foundation, the National Postcode Lottery of the Netherlands, Peace Parks Foundation, the US Fish and Wildlife Services, the University of Pretoria, the World Wildlife Fund (SARPO; Mozambique; SA), the Walt Disney Grant Foundation, and the Wildlifewins Lottery. Elephants Without Borders was funded by the Paul G. Allen Family Foundation, Jody Allen, the Woodtiger Fund, the Thomas C Bishop Charitable Foundation, the James and Deborah Burrows Foundation, and the Zoological Society of San Diego. We acknowledge the in kind logistical support of South African National Parks. en_US
dc.description.uri http://www.plosone.org en_US
dc.identifier.citation Huang, R.M., Van Aarde, R.J., Pimm, S.L., Chase, M.J. & Leggett, K. (2022) Mapping potential connections between Southern Africa’s elephant populations. PLoS One 17(10): e0275791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275791. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1932-6203 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1371/journal.pone.0275791
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/88166
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Public Library of Science en_US
dc.rights © 2022 Huang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. en_US
dc.subject Elephants en_US
dc.subject Conservation science en_US
dc.subject Rivers en_US
dc.subject Africa en_US
dc.subject Mozambique en_US
dc.subject Livestock en_US
dc.subject Malawi en_US
dc.subject Surface water en_US
dc.subject African elephant (Loxodonta africana) en_US
dc.title Mapping potential connections between Southern Africa’s elephant populations en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record