Why do large-scale agricultural investments induce different socio-economic, food security, and environmental impacts? Evidence from Kenya, Madagascar, and Mozambique

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Oberlack, Christoph
dc.contributor.author Giger, Markus
dc.contributor.author Anseeuw, Ward
dc.contributor.author Adelle, Camilla
dc.contributor.author Bourblanc, Magalie
dc.contributor.author Burnod, Perrine
dc.contributor.author Eckert, Sandra
dc.contributor.author Fitawek, Wegayehu
dc.contributor.author Fouilleux, Eve
dc.contributor.author Hendriks, Sheryl L.
dc.contributor.author Kiteme, Boniface
dc.contributor.author Masola, Livhuwani
dc.contributor.author Mawoko, Zaka Diana
dc.contributor.author Mercandalli, Sara
dc.contributor.author Reys, Aurelien
dc.contributor.author Da Silva, Maya
dc.contributor.author Van der Laan, Michael
dc.contributor.author Zaehringer, Julie G.
dc.contributor.author Messerli, Peter
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-02T08:13:40Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-02T08:13:40Z
dc.date.issued 2021-12
dc.description.abstract Large-scale agricultural investments (LAIs) transform land use systems worldwide. There is, however, limited understanding about how the common global drivers of land use change induce different forms of agricultural investment and produce different impacts on the ground. This article provides a cross-country comparative analysis of how differences in business models, land use changes, and governance systems explain differences in socio-economic, food security, and environmental impacts of LAIs in Kenya, Madagascar, and Mozambique. It brings together results on these aspects generated in the AFGROLAND project that collected data in a multi-method approach via household surveys, business model surveys, semi-structured household interviews, life-cycle assessments of farm production, analysis of remote-sensing data, key informant interviews, and document analysis. For the present project synthesis, we combined a collaborative expert workshop with a comparative analysis of 16 LAIs. The results show that the LAIs follow four distinctive impact patterns, ranging from widespread adverse impacts to moderate impacts. Results demonstrate how the following conditions influence how the global drivers of land use change translate into different LAIs and different impacts on the ground: labor intensity, prior land use, utilization of land, farm size, type of production, experience in local agriculture, land tenure security, accountability of state and local elites, the mobilization capacity of civil society, expansion of resource frontiers, agricultural intensification, and indirect land use change. The results indicate that commercial agriculture can be a component in sustainable development strategies under certain conditions, but that these strategies will fail without substantial, sustained increases in the economic viability and inclusiveness of smallholder agriculture, land tenure security, agro-ecological land management, and support for broader patterns of endogenous agrarian transformation. en_US
dc.description.department Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development en_US
dc.description.department Plant Production and Soil Science en_US
dc.description.librarian hb2022 en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Agence Nationale de la Recherche, France; National Research Foundation, South Africa; and Swiss National Science Foundation, Switzerland, via the Belmont Forum and Joint Programming Initiative on Agriculture, Food Security and Climate Change. en_US
dc.description.uri http://www.ecologyandsociety.org en_US
dc.identifier.citation Oberlack, C., Giger, M., Anseeuw, W., Adelle, C., Bourblanc, M., Burnod, P., Eckert, S., Fitawek, W., Fouilleux, E., Hendriks, S.L., Kiteme, B., Masola, L., Mawoko, Z.D., Mercandalli, S., Reys, A., Da Silva, M., Van der Laan, M., Zaehringer, J.G. & Messerli, P. 2021. Why do large-scale agricultural investments induce different socio-economic, food security, and environmental impacts? Evidence from Kenya, Madagascar, and Mozambique. Ecology and Society 26(4):18. https://DOI.org/ 10.5751/ES-12653-260418. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1708-3087
dc.identifier.other 10.5751/ES-12653-260418
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/86633
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Resilience Alliance en_US
dc.rights © 2021 by the author(s). Under license by the Resilience Alliance. en_US
dc.subject Agricultural investments en_US
dc.subject Business models en_US
dc.subject Environment en_US
dc.subject Food security en_US
dc.subject Governance en_US
dc.subject Land use change en_US
dc.subject Livelihoods en_US
dc.subject Large-scale agricultural investment (LAI) en_US
dc.title Why do large-scale agricultural investments induce different socio-economic, food security, and environmental impacts? Evidence from Kenya, Madagascar, and Mozambique en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record