Antenatal Doppler screening for fetuses at risk of adverse outcomes : a multicountry cohort study of the prevalence of abnormal resistance index in low-risk pregnant women

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Vannevel, Valerie
dc.contributor.author Vogel, Joshua P
dc.contributor.author Pattinson, Robert Clive
dc.contributor.author Adanu, Richard
dc.contributor.author Charantimath, Umesh
dc.contributor.author Goudar, Shivaprasad S
dc.contributor.author Gwako, George
dc.contributor.author Kavi, Avinash
dc.contributor.author Maya, Ernest
dc.contributor.author Osoti, Alfred
dc.contributor.author Pujar, Yeshita
dc.contributor.author Qureshi, Zahida P
dc.contributor.author Rulisa, Stephen
dc.contributor.author Botha, Tanita
dc.contributor.author Oladapo, Olufemi T
dc.date.accessioned 2022-07-21T06:05:46Z
dc.date.available 2022-07-21T06:05:46Z
dc.date.issued 2022-03
dc.description.abstract INTRODUCTION: Few interventions exist to address the high burden of stillbirths in apparently healthy pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To establish whether a trial on the impact of routine Doppler screening in a low-risk obstetric population is warranted, we determined the prevalence of abnormal fetal umbilical artery resistance indices among low-risk pregnant women using a low-cost Doppler device in five LMICs. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, prospective cohort study in Ghana, India, Kenya, Rwanda and South Africa. Trained nurses or midwives performed a single, continuous-wave Doppler screening using the Umbiflow device for low-risk pregnant women (according to local guidelines) between 28 and 34 weeks' gestation. We assessed the prevalence of abnormal (raised) resistance index (RI), including absent end diastolic flow (AEDF), and compared pregnancy and health service utilisation outcomes between women with abnormal RI versus those with normal RI. RESULTS: Of 7151 women screened, 495 (6.9%) had an abnormal RI, including 14 (0.2%) with AEDF. Caesarean section (40.8% vs 28.1%), labour induction (20.5% vs 9.0%) and low birth weight (<2500 g) (15.0% vs 6.8%) were significantly more frequent among women with abnormal RI compared with women with normal RI. Abnormal RI was associated with lower birth weights across all weight centiles. Stillbirth and perinatal mortality rates were similar between women with normal and abnormal RI. CONCLUSION: A single Doppler screening of low-risk pregnant women in LMICs using the Umbiflow device can detect a large number of fetuses at risk of growth restriction and consequent adverse perinatal outcomes. Many perinatal deaths could potentially be averted with appropriate intervention strategies. en_US
dc.description.department Obstetrics and Gynaecology en_US
dc.description.department Statistics en_US
dc.description.sponsorship UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP) en_US
dc.description.uri http://bmjopen.bmj.com en_US
dc.identifier.citation Vannevel, V., Vogel, J.P., Pattinson, R.C., Adanu, R., Charantimath, U., Goudar, S.S., Gwako, G., Kavi, A., Maya, E., Osoti, A., Pujar, Y., Qureshi, Z.P., Rulisa, S., Botha, T. & Oladapo, O.T. Antenatal Doppler screening for fetuses at risk of adverse outcomes: a multicountry cohort study of the prevalence of abnormal resistance index in low-risk pregnant women. BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 16;12(3):e053622. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053622. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2044-6055 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053622
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/86349
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BMJ Publishing Group en_US
dc.rights © World Health Organization 2022. Licensee BMJ. en_US
dc.subject Obstetrics en_US
dc.subject Primary care en_US
dc.subject Public health en_US
dc.subject Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) en_US
dc.subject Doppler screening en_US
dc.subject Stillbirths en_US
dc.subject Pregnant women en_US
dc.title Antenatal Doppler screening for fetuses at risk of adverse outcomes : a multicountry cohort study of the prevalence of abnormal resistance index in low-risk pregnant women en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record