JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
Transient simulation of an atmospheric boundary layer flow past a heliostat using the Scale-Adaptive Simulation turbulence model
Poulain, P.E.; Craig, K.J. (Kenneth); Meyer, Josua P.
Heliostat fields are exposed to changing climatic conditions as they are mostly erected in open environments where the wind naturally features a high unsteadiness at low altitude due to the ground effects. Much of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) content in the open literature is focused on Reynolds–averaged-Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations, which can only predict mean loads. This paper considers an isolated heliostat in worst-case orientation. The drag force is numerically modelled by means of a Scale-Resolving Simulation (SRS) in ANSYS v19. This paper firstly deals with two different methods that generate perturbations at the inlet boundary: the spectral synthesiser and the vortex method. In an empty domain, an atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) profile is modelled based on a wind tunnel experiment. Secondly, the wind tunnel test of a single heliostat model in upright orientation is replicated, aiming to model the mean and peak drag forces. Applicable for highly separated flows, the Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS) turbulence model is employed as it is computationally more affordable than a Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) approach. The latter would require a higher grid resolution and a reduced time step size. The SAS showed little but acceptable decay of the inlet profiles whilst achieving lateral homogeneity. The mean and root-mean-square error of the drag force signal showed a deviation with the experiment of 0.04% and 5.8%, respectively, whereas the error on the peak drag forces was around 18%, possibly mostly due to the under-prediction of the turbulent integral length scale at the model location.