Abstract:
The OT books, Ezra and Nehemiah, are to be considered as one book. This is more or less the
common conviction of most OT scholars today. However, their redaction process raises many
questions. What is their relation to the book of Chronicles, and how is their actual structure to
be understood? Why do we find two almost identical lists of returnees from exile in Ezra 2 and
Nehemiah 7? What about the differences between these lists? This article understands the
structure of Ezra-Nehemiah as a consciously created literary unit, where the two lists of
returnees serve as an important part of the literary structure. The author works on the
assumption of the so-called new literary criticism, understanding the narrative in the book on
a synchronic basis. He shows that the book of Ezra-Nehemiah can indeed be understood as
one literary unit, and that the two lists of returnees function as a literary means to structure the
book. There is therefore no need to ‘re-organise’ the narrated events in Ezra-Nehemiah
according to an alleged different chronological order.
INTRADISCIPLINARY AND/ OR INTERDISCIPLIARY IMPLICATIONS: The study argued for a canonical
and synchronic approach to biblical narratives. The biblical texts should be understood as
consciously created narratives, where the apparent discrepancies are important aspects of the
narrative fixture.
