Abstract:
The interpretation and appropriation of Romans 13:1–7 have been a challenge for generations
because this text confuses Christians as to how they should relate and participate in the
politics of the day. This article interprets the text in its historical and literary context before
appropriating it to the Second Republic of Zimbabwe. The conclusion reached is that the text
does not directly speak to church–state relations but rather should be understood in its
context in Paul’s time. Appropriating the text to the Second Republic requires us to delineate
whether the governing authorities of the Second Republic are doing the will of God or
whether they are terrorising people into obedience. The article concludes that the text does
not forbid people from resisting illegitimate and brutal governments and does not demand
passive citizenship.
CONTRIBUTION: The article is an interpretation and appropriation of Romans 13:1–7 to the
Second Republic of Zimbabwe. Appropriating the text to the Second Republic requires one to
delineate whether the governing authorities are doing the will of God or not. It is within the
scope of this theological journal that issues of church-state relationships and theological
reflection should be addressed, hence this article fits well within this scope.
