Investigating selective media for optimal isolation of Brucella spp. in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ledwaba, Maphuti Betty
dc.contributor.author Ndumnego, Okechukwu C.
dc.contributor.author Matle, Itumeleng
dc.contributor.author Gelaw, Awoke K.
dc.contributor.author Van Heerden, Henriette
dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-18T10:46:41Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-18T10:46:41Z
dc.date.issued 2020-03-04
dc.description.abstract Bovine brucellosis in South Africa is caused mainly by Brucella abortus biovar (bv.) 1 and less frequently by B. abortus bv. 2. Bacterial isolation is regarded as the gold standard for diagnosis of Brucella species; however, it is not very sensitive. The aim of this study was to determine the selective medium with optimum antibiotic composition that will allow the growth of Brucella species (spp.) while inhibiting moulds, yeast and most, if not all, Gram-negative contaminants in South Africa. In the controlled experiment, modified Agrifood Research and Technology Center of Aragon (CITA) medium (mCITA) seemed to be the optimum selective medium for isolation of Brucella spp. as compared with Farrell’s medium (FM) and modified Thayer Martin (mTM), while FM inhibited the growth of most fungal and bacterial contaminants. Mean comparison between the three media used to culture B. abortus resulted in lower mean difference ranging from 0 to 2.33. In case of Brucella ovis, high mean difference was obtained when comparing FM with mCITA (10.33) and mTM (12). However, the mean differences of 0.67 and 1.67 were obtained when comparing mCITA and mTM media used to, respectively, culture pasteurised and raw milk spiked with B. ovis. Further optimisation at the Agricultural Research Council – Onderstepoort Veterinary Research Institute resulted in a comparable performance between FM and mCITA; however, mCITA allowed optimal growth of the fastidious B. ovis, which is generally inhibited on FM. Generally, mCITA seemed to be the optimum selective medium for isolation of Brucella spp., while FM inhibits the growth of most fungal and bacterial contaminants. Thus, veterinary laboratories can use mCITA and/or FM but should take into consideration the detection of factious Brucella isolated in the country or region. en_ZA
dc.description.department Veterinary Tropical Diseases en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2021 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship The Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (GDARD), National Research Foundation (NRF), AgriSETA and the University of Pretoria. en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.ojvr.org en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Ledwaba, M.B., Ndumnego, O.C., Matle, I., Gelaw, A.K. & Van Heerden, H., 2020, ‘Investigating selective media for optimal isolation of Brucella spp. in South Africa’, Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 87(1), a1792. https://DOI.org/10.4102/ojvr.v87i1.1792. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0030-2465 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 2219-0635 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.4102/ojvr.v87i1.1792
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/79945
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher AOSIS OpenJournals en_ZA
dc.rights © 2020. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. en_ZA
dc.subject Bovine brucellosis en_ZA
dc.subject Selective media en_ZA
dc.subject Bacterial isolation en_ZA
dc.subject South Africa (SA) en_ZA
dc.title Investigating selective media for optimal isolation of Brucella spp. in South Africa en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record