Investigating selective media for optimal isolation of Brucella spp. in South Africa

dc.contributor.authorLedwaba, Maphuti Betty
dc.contributor.authorNdumnego, Okechukwu C.
dc.contributor.authorMatle, Itumeleng
dc.contributor.authorGelaw, Awoke K.
dc.contributor.authorVan Heerden, Henriette
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-18T10:46:41Z
dc.date.available2021-05-18T10:46:41Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-04
dc.description.abstractBovine brucellosis in South Africa is caused mainly by Brucella abortus biovar (bv.) 1 and less frequently by B. abortus bv. 2. Bacterial isolation is regarded as the gold standard for diagnosis of Brucella species; however, it is not very sensitive. The aim of this study was to determine the selective medium with optimum antibiotic composition that will allow the growth of Brucella species (spp.) while inhibiting moulds, yeast and most, if not all, Gram-negative contaminants in South Africa. In the controlled experiment, modified Agrifood Research and Technology Center of Aragon (CITA) medium (mCITA) seemed to be the optimum selective medium for isolation of Brucella spp. as compared with Farrell’s medium (FM) and modified Thayer Martin (mTM), while FM inhibited the growth of most fungal and bacterial contaminants. Mean comparison between the three media used to culture B. abortus resulted in lower mean difference ranging from 0 to 2.33. In case of Brucella ovis, high mean difference was obtained when comparing FM with mCITA (10.33) and mTM (12). However, the mean differences of 0.67 and 1.67 were obtained when comparing mCITA and mTM media used to, respectively, culture pasteurised and raw milk spiked with B. ovis. Further optimisation at the Agricultural Research Council – Onderstepoort Veterinary Research Institute resulted in a comparable performance between FM and mCITA; however, mCITA allowed optimal growth of the fastidious B. ovis, which is generally inhibited on FM. Generally, mCITA seemed to be the optimum selective medium for isolation of Brucella spp., while FM inhibits the growth of most fungal and bacterial contaminants. Thus, veterinary laboratories can use mCITA and/or FM but should take into consideration the detection of factious Brucella isolated in the country or region.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentVeterinary Tropical Diseasesen_ZA
dc.description.librarianam2021en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (GDARD), National Research Foundation (NRF), AgriSETA and the University of Pretoria.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.ojvr.orgen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationLedwaba, M.B., Ndumnego, O.C., Matle, I., Gelaw, A.K. & Van Heerden, H., 2020, ‘Investigating selective media for optimal isolation of Brucella spp. in South Africa’, Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 87(1), a1792. https://DOI.org/10.4102/ojvr.v87i1.1792.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0030-2465 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2219-0635 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.4102/ojvr.v87i1.1792
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/79945
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherAOSIS OpenJournalsen_ZA
dc.rights© 2020. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.en_ZA
dc.subjectBovine brucellosisen_ZA
dc.subjectSelective mediaen_ZA
dc.subjectBacterial isolationen_ZA
dc.subjectSouth Africa (SA)en_ZA
dc.titleInvestigating selective media for optimal isolation of Brucella spp. in South Africaen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ledwaba_Investigating_2020.pdf
Size:
697.55 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: