dc.contributor.author |
Dom, Sebastian
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
De Schryver, Gilles-Maurice
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Bostoen, Koen
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-03-26T06:23:19Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-03-26T06:23:19Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2020 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The North-Angolan Bantu language Kisikongo has a present tense (O-Rang- a; R=root) that is morphologically more marked than the future tense (O-R-a). We reconstruct how this typologically uncommon tense-marking feature came about by drawing on both historical and comparative evidence. Our diachronic corpus covers four centuries that can be subdivided in three periods, viz. (1) mid-17th, (2) late-19th/early-20th, and (3) late-20th/ early-21st centuries. The comparative data stem from several present-day languages of the “Kikongo Language Cluster.” We show that mid-17th century Kisikongo had three distinct constructions: O-R-a (with present progressive, habitual and generic meaning), O-R-ang-a (with present habitual meaning), and ku-R-a (with future meaning). By the end of the 19th century the last construction is no longer attested, and both present and future time reference are expressed by a segmentally identical construction, namely O- R-a. We argue that two seemingly independent but possibly interacting diachronic evolutions conspired towards such present-future isomorphism: (1) the semantic extension of an original present-tense construction from present to future leading to polysemy, and (2) the loss of the future prefix ku-, as part of a broader phenomenon of prefix reduction, inducing homonymy. To resolve the ambiguity, the O-R-ang-a construction evolved into the main present-tense construction. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.department |
African Languages |
en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian |
hj2021 |
en_ZA |
dc.description.sponsorship |
An FWO doctoral fellowship, the Special Research Fund of Ghent University and the
European Research Council through a Consolidator Grant (n° 724275). |
en_ZA |
dc.description.uri |
https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/22102124 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation |
Dom, S., De Schryver, G.-M. & Bostoen, K. 2020, 'Kisikongo (Bantu, H16a) present-future isomorphism : a diachronic conspiracy between semantics and phonology', Journal of Historical Linguistics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 251-288. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn |
2210-2116 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
2210-2124 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1075/jhl.18030.dom |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/79120 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher |
John Benjamins Publishing |
en_ZA |
dc.rights |
John Benjamins Publishing |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Present-future isomorphism |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Tense-aspect |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Tone |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Bantu |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Kikongo language cluster |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Linguistics |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Kisikongo |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Historical corpus |
en_ZA |
dc.subject.other |
Humanities articles SDG-04 |
|
dc.subject.other |
SDG-04: Quality education |
|
dc.title |
Kisikongo (Bantu, H16a) present-future isomorphism : a diachronic conspiracy between semantics and phonology |
en_ZA |
dc.type |
Postprint Article |
en_ZA |