Are macroeconomic factors adequate proxies for systematic influences in stock returns? A South African perspective

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Szczygielski, Jan Jakub
dc.contributor.author Brummer, L.M., 1940-
dc.contributor.author Wolmarans, Hendrik Petrus
dc.contributor.author Zaremba, Adam
dc.date.accessioned 2021-02-08T12:54:01Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.description.abstract We investigate whether macroeconomic factors adequately proxy for systematic influences in stock returns within the South African context. We also investigate whether a commonly used solution to factor omission in macroeconomic factor models, the residual market factor, adequately reflects systematic influences not reflected by a set of macroeconomic factors. Our contribution lies in precisely quantifying the ability of macroeconomic and residual market factors to proxy for systematic drivers of returns. Systematic influences are represented by statistically derived factor scores which are then related to a set of carefully selected macroeconomic factors. We find that the identification of macroeconomic factors that proxy for systematic influences is a challenge in itself. Once identified, macroeconomic factors are poor and unstable proxies for systematic influences and the use of a residual market factor does not significantly improve the approximation of factor scores. Our conclusion is that macroeconomic linear factor models are likely to be underspecified, even if a residual market factor is included. This has implications for researchers, investors, econometricians and economists that rely on macroeconomic factor models to study financial markets. en_ZA
dc.description.department Financial Management en_ZA
dc.description.embargo 2021-03-04
dc.description.librarian hj2021 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship The National Science Center of Poland en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/riaj20 en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Jan J. Szczygielski, Leon M. Brümmer, Hendrik P. Wolmarans & Adam Zaremba (2020) Are macroeconomic factors adequate proxies for systematic influences in stock returns? A South African perspective, Investment Analysts Journal, 49:1, 34-52, DOI:v 10.1080/10293523.2020.1723854. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1029-3523 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 2077-0227 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1080/10293523.2020.1723854
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/78319
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Routledge en_ZA
dc.rights © 2020 Investment Analysts Society of South Africa. This is an electronic version of an article published in Investment Analysts Journal, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 34-52, 2020. doi : 10.1080/10293523.2020.1723854. Investment Analysts Journal is available online at : http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/riaj20. en_ZA
dc.subject Macroeconomic factors en_ZA
dc.subject Factor scores en_ZA
dc.subject Linear factor model en_ZA
dc.subject Systematic influences en_ZA
dc.subject Residual market factor en_ZA
dc.subject Underspecification en_ZA
dc.title Are macroeconomic factors adequate proxies for systematic influences in stock returns? A South African perspective en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record