Contributions to the helminth fauna of South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Baer, J.G.
dc.contributor.editor Theiler, Arnold, Sir, 1867-1936
dc.contributor.editor Union of South Africa. Department of Agriculture
dc.date.accessioned 2020-12-21T16:28:53Z
dc.date.available 2020-12-21T16:28:53Z
dc.date.created 2020
dc.date.issued 1926
dc.description Includes bibliographical references en_ZA
dc.description The articles have been scanned in colour with a HP Scanjet 5590; 300dpi. Adobe Acrobat XI Pro was used to OCR the text and also for the merging and conversion to the final presentation PDF-format. en_ZA
dc.description.abstract Whereas the South American and Australian helminth-fauna is comparatively well known, that of South Africa has been sadly neglected until recent years. The probable reason of this is that scientific explorers do not generally trouble to collect intestinal parasites either because of the extra trouble incurred, or else underestimating the importance of this factor for faunistic studies. It was with this fact in mind that Sir Arnold Theiler, K.C.M.G., Director of the Veterinary Research Laboratory, Onderstepoort, Pretoria, had collected all the intestinal parasites from the animals shot for museum purposes in the districts outlying Pretoria. This valuable collection, which was presented to Prof. 0. Fuhrmann a few years ago, consists chiefly of nematodes and of avian cestodes, the mammalian cestodes studied in this paper representing about one-quarter of the whole collection. As was to be expected, of the twenty-two species examined, nine are new to science, including two new genera and one new family. Of the nineteen hosts, fifteen have to our knowledge never been recorded before as harbouring cestode parasites. We have been able to clear up certain points of systematic interest. This represents, however, an infinitesimal portion of the work left to be done with regard to mammalian cestodes. Certain genera are in much need of revision: the genus Taenia s. str. is an example. To our mind, only good results are to be obtained from the study of the original species, and any species insufficiently described of which no types or cotypes exist should be suppressed. This seems to be the only way of straightening out the synonymy of certain groups, in which much confusion has been caused of late by "occasional helminthologists," whose only aim seems to be to place their name behind a species. The results of our studies have showed us that authors do not generally take into consideration the individual variation of a species, variation which, as we will show, may be very great in certain cases. The role of the host should also be considered, and would prevent authors committing such absurdities as the recording of species of Anoplocephala, Davainea, and Hymenolepis from marine fishes! en_ZA
dc.description.librarian ab2020 en_ZA
dc.format.extent 75 pages : illustrations, tables en_ZA
dc.format.medium PDF en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Baer, JG 1926, ‘Contributions to the helminth fauna of South Africa', 11th and 12th Reports of the Director of Veterinary Education and Research Part 1, pp. 61-136. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0330-2465
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/77450
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Pretoria : Government Printer and Stationery Office en_ZA
dc.rights ©1926 Union of South Africa, Dept. of Agriculture (original). © 2020 University of Pretoria. Dept. of Library Services (digital). en_ZA
dc.subject Veterinary reports en_ZA
dc.subject Veterinary medicine en_ZA
dc.subject Veterinary parasitology en_ZA
dc.subject Parasites en_ZA
dc.subject.lcsh Veterinary medicine -- South Africa
dc.title Contributions to the helminth fauna of South Africa en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record