Sampling bias in reptile occurrence data for the Kruger National Park

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Barends, Jody M.
dc.contributor.author Pietersen, Darren William
dc.contributor.author Zambatis, Guinevere
dc.contributor.author Tye, Donovan R.C.
dc.contributor.author Maritz, Bryan
dc.date.accessioned 2020-11-16T05:31:29Z
dc.date.available 2020-11-16T05:31:29Z
dc.date.issued 2020-05-11
dc.description.abstract To effectively conserve and manage species, it is important to (1) understand how they are spatially distributed across the globe at both broad and fine spatial resolutions and (2) elucidate the determinants of these distributions. However, information pertaining to the distributions of many species remains poor as occurrence data are often scarce or collected with varying motivations, making the resulting patterns susceptible to sampling bias. Exacerbating an already limited quantity of occurrence data with an assortment of biases hinders their effectiveness for research, thus making it important to identify and understand the biases present within species occurrence data sets. We quantitatively assessed occurrence records of 126 reptile species occurring in the Kruger National Park (KNP), South Africa, to quantify the severity of sampling bias within this data set. We collated a data set of 7118 occurrence records from museum, literature and citizen science sources and analysed these at a biologically relevant spatial resolution of 1 km × 1 km. As a result of logistical challenges associated with sampling in KNP, approximately 92% of KNP is data deficient for reptile occurrences at the 1 km × 1 km resolution. Additionally, the spatial coverage of available occurrences varied at species and family levels, and the majority of occurrence records were strongly associated with publicly accessible human infrastructure. Furthermore, we found that sampled areas within KNP were not necessarily ecologically representative of KNP as a whole, suggesting that areas of unique environmental space remain to be sampled. Our findings highlight the need for substantially greater sampling effort for reptiles across KNP and emphasise the need to carefully consider the sampling biases within existing data should these be used for conservation management decision-making. Modelling species distributions could potentially serve as a short-term solution, but a concomitant increase in surveys across the park is needed. CONSERVATION IMPLICATIONS : The sampling biases present within KNP reptile occurrence data inhibit the inference of fine-scale species distributions within and across the park, which limits the usage of these data towards meaningfully informing conservation management decisions as applicable to reptile species in KNP. en_ZA
dc.description.department Zoology and Entomology en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2020 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship The Ada and Bertie Levenstein Foundation, Merseta and the National Research Foundation. en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.koedoe.co.za/ en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Barends, J.M., Pietersen, D.W., Zambatis, G., Tye, D.R.C. & Maritz, B., 2020, ‘Sampling bias in reptile occurrence data for the Kruger National Park’, Koedoe 62(1), a1579. https://DOI.org/ 10.4102/koedoe.v62i1.1579. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0075-6458 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 2071-0771 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.4102/ koedoe.v62i1.1579
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/77007
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher AOSIS Open Journals en_ZA
dc.rights © 2020. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. en_ZA
dc.subject Conservation management en_ZA
dc.subject Occurrence data en_ZA
dc.subject Reptile fauna en_ZA
dc.subject Sampling bias en_ZA
dc.subject Kruger National Park (KNP) en_ZA
dc.subject South Africa (SA) en_ZA
dc.title Sampling bias in reptile occurrence data for the Kruger National Park en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record