Efficacy of diffeomorphic surface matching and 3D geometric morphometrics for taxonomic discrimination of Early Pleistocene hominin mandibular molars

Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Braga, Jose
dc.contributor.author Zimmer, Veronika
dc.contributor.author Dumoncel, Jean
dc.contributor.author Samir, Chafik
dc.contributor.author De Beer, Frikkie
dc.contributor.author Zanolli, Clement
dc.contributor.author Pinto, Deborah
dc.contributor.author Rohlf, F. James
dc.contributor.author Grine, Frederick E.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-02-27T06:08:21Z
dc.date.issued 2019-05
dc.description.abstract Morphometric assessments of the dentition have played significant roles in hypotheses relating to taxonomic diversity among extinct hominins. In this regard, emphasis has been placed on the statistical appraisal of intraspecific variation to identify morphological criteria that convey maximum discriminatory power. Three-dimensional geometric morphometric (3D GM) approaches that utilize landmarks and semi-landmarks to quantify shape variation have enjoyed increasingly popular use over the past twenty-five years in assessments of the outer enamel surface (OES) and enamel–dentine junction (EDJ) of fossil molars. Recently developed diffeomorphic surface matching (DSM) methods that model the deformation between shapes have drastically reduced if not altogether eliminated potential methodological inconsistencies associated with the a priori identification of landmarks and delineation of semi-landmarks. As such, DSM has the potential to better capture the geometric details that describe tooth shape by accounting for both homologous and non-homologous (i.e., discrete) features, and permitting the statistical determination of geometric correspondence. We compare the discriminatory power of 3D GM and DSM in the evaluation of the OES and EDJ of mandibular permanent molars attributed to Australopithecus africanus, Paranthropus robustus and early Homo sp. from the sites of Sterkfontein and Swartkrans. For all three molars, classification and clustering scores demonstrate that DSM performs better at separating the A. africanus and P. robustus samples than does 3D GM. The EDJ provided the best results. P. robustus evinces greater morphological variability than A. africanus. The DSM assessment of the early Homo molar from Swartkrans reveals its distinctiveness from either australopith sample, and the “unknown” specimen from Sterkfontein (Stw 151) is notably more similar to Homo than to A. africanus. en_ZA
dc.description.department Anatomy en_ZA
dc.description.embargo 2020-05-01
dc.description.librarian hj2020 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship The Erasmus Mundus “AESOP plus” programme of the European Union, the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the French Embassy in South Africa through the Cultural and Cooperation Services, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and the HPC resources of the CALMIP Supercomputing Centre. FEG and FJR were supported by the College of Arts and Sciences, Stony Brook University. en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jhevol en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Braga, J., Zimmer, V., Dumoncel, J. et al. 2019, 'Efficacy of diffeomorphic surface matching and 3D geometric morphometrics for taxonomic discrimination of Early Pleistocene hominin mandibular molars', Journal of Human Evolution, vol. 130, pp. 21-35. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0047-2484 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1095-8606 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.01.009
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/73571
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Elsevier en_ZA
dc.rights © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Human Evolution. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Human Evolution, vol. 130, pp. 21-35, 2019. doi : 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.01.009. en_ZA
dc.subject Three-dimensional geometric morphometric (3D GM) en_ZA
dc.subject Enamel–dentine junction (EDJ) en_ZA
dc.subject Diffeomorphic surface matching (DSM) en_ZA
dc.subject Outer enamel surface (OES) en_ZA
dc.subject Sterkfontein en_ZA
dc.subject Swartkrans en_ZA
dc.subject Australopithecus africanus en_ZA
dc.subject Paranthropus robustus en_ZA
dc.subject Homo en_ZA
dc.subject.other Health sciences article SDG-03
dc.subject.other SDG-03: Good health and well-being
dc.title Efficacy of diffeomorphic surface matching and 3D geometric morphometrics for taxonomic discrimination of Early Pleistocene hominin mandibular molars en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record