Rotational grazing approaches reduces external and internal parasite loads in cattle

Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Rapiya, Monde
dc.contributor.author Hawkins, Heidi-Jayne
dc.contributor.author Muchenje, Voster
dc.contributor.author Mupangwa, John F.
dc.contributor.author Marufu, Munyaradzi Christopher
dc.contributor.author Dzama, Kennedy
dc.contributor.author Mapiye, Cletos
dc.date.accessioned 2019-11-22T07:49:51Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.description.abstract We tested whether holistic planned grazing (HPG) and four-camp grazing (FCG) rotational grazing approaches influence beef cattle parasites counts compared with continuous, season-long (SLG) grazing. We expected that parasite counts would increase linearly with increasing camp occupancy by cattle from 1 d (70-camp, HPG) to 21–28 d (four-camp, FCG) to 180 d (one-camp per season, SLG). Tick and faecal egg counts were observed across seasons on 30 steers raised on a private farm in Cedarville, South Africa. Tick species identified were Rhipicephalus evertsi evertsi, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus, Hyalomma spp. and Amblyomma hebreaum with respective prevalences of 32%, 29%, 20% and 19%. Unidentified roundworms had the highest faecal worm egg counts (81.2%) followed by Coccidia (16.4%), Nematodirus (1.2%) and strongyles (1.2%). Overall, prevalence and mean counts for ticks and faecal worm eggs were highest in the hot wet season, with the SLG having greater (P ≤ 0.05) values than either of the rotational approaches. However, increasing camp number and animal densities above four camps did not reduce (P > 0.05) parasite loads compared with HPG. Current results suggest that rotational grazing is a potential strategy to reduce livestock losses caused by high tick and worm loads in cattle, especially in the hot wet season. en_ZA
dc.description.department Production Animal Studies en_ZA
dc.description.embargo 2020-09-22
dc.description.librarian hj2019 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship The South African Red Meat Research and Development Trust (IRMA REF 21544) and Cape Wools South Africa (IRMA REF 22491) through H-JH of Conservation South Africa. RM acknowledges the National Research Foundation for providing a bursary. en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tarf20 en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Monde Rapiya, Heidi-Jayne Hawkins, Voster Muchenje, John F Mupangwa, Munyaradzi C Marufu, Kennedy Dzama & Cletos Mapiye (2019) Rotational grazing approaches reduces external and internal parasite loads in cattle, African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 36:3, 151-159. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1022-0119 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1727-9380 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.2989/10220119.2019.1628104
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/72380
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher NISC (Pty) Ltd and Informa UK Limited (trading as Taylor & Francis Group) en_ZA
dc.rights © NISC (Pty) Ltd. This is an electronic version of an article published in African Journal of Range and Forage Science, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 151-159, 2019. doi : 10.2989/10220119.2019.1628104. African Journal of Range and Forage Science is available online at : http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tarf20. en_ZA
dc.subject Season-long grazing (SLG) en_ZA
dc.subject Holistic planned grazing (HPG) en_ZA
dc.subject Four-camp grazing (FCG) en_ZA
dc.subject Rotational grazing en_ZA
dc.subject Beef cattle parasites en_ZA
dc.subject Animal health en_ZA
dc.subject Cattle en_ZA
dc.subject Tick count en_ZA
dc.subject Faecal worm eggs en_ZA
dc.title Rotational grazing approaches reduces external and internal parasite loads in cattle en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record