Rotational grazing approaches reduces external and internal parasite loads in cattle

dc.contributor.authorRapiya, Monde
dc.contributor.authorHawkins, Heidi-Jayne
dc.contributor.authorMuchenje, Voster
dc.contributor.authorMupangwa, John F.
dc.contributor.authorMarufu, Munyaradzi Christopher
dc.contributor.authorDzama, Kennedy
dc.contributor.authorMapiye, Cletos
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-22T07:49:51Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractWe tested whether holistic planned grazing (HPG) and four-camp grazing (FCG) rotational grazing approaches influence beef cattle parasites counts compared with continuous, season-long (SLG) grazing. We expected that parasite counts would increase linearly with increasing camp occupancy by cattle from 1 d (70-camp, HPG) to 21–28 d (four-camp, FCG) to 180 d (one-camp per season, SLG). Tick and faecal egg counts were observed across seasons on 30 steers raised on a private farm in Cedarville, South Africa. Tick species identified were Rhipicephalus evertsi evertsi, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus, Hyalomma spp. and Amblyomma hebreaum with respective prevalences of 32%, 29%, 20% and 19%. Unidentified roundworms had the highest faecal worm egg counts (81.2%) followed by Coccidia (16.4%), Nematodirus (1.2%) and strongyles (1.2%). Overall, prevalence and mean counts for ticks and faecal worm eggs were highest in the hot wet season, with the SLG having greater (P ≤ 0.05) values than either of the rotational approaches. However, increasing camp number and animal densities above four camps did not reduce (P > 0.05) parasite loads compared with HPG. Current results suggest that rotational grazing is a potential strategy to reduce livestock losses caused by high tick and worm loads in cattle, especially in the hot wet season.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentProduction Animal Studiesen_ZA
dc.description.embargo2020-09-22
dc.description.librarianhj2019en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipThe South African Red Meat Research and Development Trust (IRMA REF 21544) and Cape Wools South Africa (IRMA REF 22491) through H-JH of Conservation South Africa. RM acknowledges the National Research Foundation for providing a bursary.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tarf20en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationMonde Rapiya, Heidi-Jayne Hawkins, Voster Muchenje, John F Mupangwa, Munyaradzi C Marufu, Kennedy Dzama & Cletos Mapiye (2019) Rotational grazing approaches reduces external and internal parasite loads in cattle, African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 36:3, 151-159.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1022-0119 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1727-9380 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.2989/10220119.2019.1628104
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/72380
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherNISC (Pty) Ltd and Informa UK Limited (trading as Taylor & Francis Group)en_ZA
dc.rights© NISC (Pty) Ltd. This is an electronic version of an article published in African Journal of Range and Forage Science, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 151-159, 2019. doi : 10.2989/10220119.2019.1628104. African Journal of Range and Forage Science is available online at : http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tarf20.en_ZA
dc.subjectSeason-long grazing (SLG)en_ZA
dc.subjectHolistic planned grazing (HPG)en_ZA
dc.subjectFour-camp grazing (FCG)en_ZA
dc.subjectRotational grazingen_ZA
dc.subjectBeef cattle parasitesen_ZA
dc.subjectAnimal healthen_ZA
dc.subjectCattleen_ZA
dc.subjectTick counten_ZA
dc.subjectFaecal worm eggsen_ZA
dc.titleRotational grazing approaches reduces external and internal parasite loads in cattleen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rapiya_Rotational_2019.pdf
Size:
1.4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: