Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
dc.contributor.author | Naicker, Prisha![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Thopil, George Alex![]() |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-02T11:16:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-07 | |
dc.description.abstract | A range of varying criteria with trade-offs need consideration when selecting a suitable renewable energy technology (RET) for a specific area or location. In this study RETs in South Africa, in accordance with the national renewable energy program, were assessed to compare and highlight feasible technology options. A key objective of the study was to develop a framework that could be used to assess the various RETs at utility scale. Important criteria contributing toward the assessment of RETs were identified from literature. The criteria were used within the framework for analysis which consisted of the following factors: technical, economic, environmental, social and political. The goal of assessing RETs in South Africa was located at the top of the framework hierarchy. A total of 15 criteria were identified to use as part of the assessment. A decision-making matrix based on both qualitative and quantitative data was used to score the criteria. The RETs (solar PV, wind, CSP, hydro, biogas and biomass) in South Africa were evaluated with respect to each criterion. The study aims to contribute towards - from a developing country perspective - highlighting key barriers to technology adoption, assist in investment decisions, and ultimately contribute toward a sustainable energy infrastructure. From the analysis performed, solar PV and wind were favoured due to technology maturity and financier perception while CSP also scored favourably due to the potential to meet the baseload energy requirements. The key policy barriers identified that require attention include improved knowledge transfer and better maintenance skills across all technologies while site suitability was identified as a major barrier for hydro and biomass RETs. | en_ZA |
dc.description.department | Graduate School of Technology Management (GSTM) | en_ZA |
dc.description.embargo | 2020-07-01 | |
dc.description.librarian | hj2019 | en_ZA |
dc.description.uri | http://www.elsevier.com/ locate/jclepro | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Naicker, P. & Thopil, G.A. 2019, 'A framework for sustainable utility scale renewable energy selection in South Africa', Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 224, pp. 637-650. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 0959-6526 (print) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1879-1786 (online) | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.257 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/71553 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_ZA |
dc.rights | © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Cleaner Production. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 224, pp. 637-650, 2019. doi : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.257. | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Renewable energy technology (RET) | en_ZA |
dc.subject | South Africa (SA) | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Decision-making matrix | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Multi-criteria analysis | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Framework | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Renewable energy | en_ZA |
dc.title | A framework for sustainable utility scale renewable energy selection in South Africa | en_ZA |
dc.type | Postprint Article | en_ZA |