dc.contributor.author |
Zajas, Pawel
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mickiewicz, Adam
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-09-28T10:41:19Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-09-28T10:41:19Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
In this article Paweł Zajas takes a critical look at the polemics around Artur Domosławski’s
biography of Ryszard Kapuściński (2010). Leaving aside controversies that are either political
or personal, Zajas argues for a critical discussion of these events. Two visions of non-fiction
have emerged out of the heated debate: adherents of the genre’s progressive ‘hybridisation’
acquiesce to Kapuściński poetic licence, while opponents see it necessary to delimit fiction
and non-fiction. The aesthetics of the reception of non-fiction was a key aspect of the debate,
as were prescriptive arguments concerning the genre. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.department |
Afrikaans |
en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian |
am2017 |
en_ZA |
dc.description.uri |
http://tekstydrugie.pl/en/ |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation |
Zajas, P. & Mickiewicz, A. 2011, 'Wokół Kapuściński non-fiction.
Próba podsumowania i ewaluacji dyskusji', Teksty Drugie, pp. 265-278. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn |
0867-0633 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/62531 |
|
dc.language.iso |
other |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher |
Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences |
en_ZA |
dc.rights |
© 2011 Wszystkie prawa zastrzeżone |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Polemics |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Controversies |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Non-fiction |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Artur Domosławski |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Biography of Ryszard Kapuściński (2010) |
en_ZA |
dc.title |
Wokół Kapuściński non-fiction. Próba podsumowania i ewaluacji dyskusji |
en_ZA |
dc.title.alternative |
Around Kapuciñski non-fiction. Evaluating the discussion |
en_ZA |
dc.type |
Article |
en_ZA |