Wokół Kapuściński non-fiction. Próba podsumowania i ewaluacji dyskusji

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Zajas, Pawel
dc.contributor.author Mickiewicz, Adam
dc.date.accessioned 2017-09-28T10:41:19Z
dc.date.available 2017-09-28T10:41:19Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.description.abstract In this article Paweł Zajas takes a critical look at the polemics around Artur Domosławski’s biography of Ryszard Kapuściński (2010). Leaving aside controversies that are either political or personal, Zajas argues for a critical discussion of these events. Two visions of non-fiction have emerged out of the heated debate: adherents of the genre’s progressive ‘hybridisation’ acquiesce to Kapuściński poetic licence, while opponents see it necessary to delimit fiction and non-fiction. The aesthetics of the reception of non-fiction was a key aspect of the debate, as were prescriptive arguments concerning the genre. en_ZA
dc.description.department Afrikaans en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2017 en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://tekstydrugie.pl/en/ en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Zajas, P. & Mickiewicz, A. 2011, 'Wokół Kapuściński non-fiction. Próba podsumowania i ewaluacji dyskusji', Teksty Drugie, pp. 265-278. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0867-0633
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/62531
dc.language.iso other en_ZA
dc.publisher Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences en_ZA
dc.rights © 2011 Wszystkie prawa zastrzeżone en_ZA
dc.subject Polemics en_ZA
dc.subject Controversies en_ZA
dc.subject Non-fiction en_ZA
dc.subject Artur Domosławski en_ZA
dc.subject Biography of Ryszard Kapuściński (2010) en_ZA
dc.title Wokół Kapuściński non-fiction. Próba podsumowania i ewaluacji dyskusji en_ZA
dc.title.alternative Around Kapuciñski non-fiction. Evaluating the discussion en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record