Wokół Kapuściński non-fiction. Próba podsumowania i ewaluacji dyskusji
dc.contributor.author | Zajas, Pawel | |
dc.contributor.author | Mickiewicz, Adam | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-28T10:41:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-28T10:41:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this article Paweł Zajas takes a critical look at the polemics around Artur Domosławski’s biography of Ryszard Kapuściński (2010). Leaving aside controversies that are either political or personal, Zajas argues for a critical discussion of these events. Two visions of non-fiction have emerged out of the heated debate: adherents of the genre’s progressive ‘hybridisation’ acquiesce to Kapuściński poetic licence, while opponents see it necessary to delimit fiction and non-fiction. The aesthetics of the reception of non-fiction was a key aspect of the debate, as were prescriptive arguments concerning the genre. | en_ZA |
dc.description.department | Afrikaans | en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian | am2017 | en_ZA |
dc.description.uri | http://tekstydrugie.pl/en/ | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Zajas, P. & Mickiewicz, A. 2011, 'Wokół Kapuściński non-fiction. Próba podsumowania i ewaluacji dyskusji', Teksty Drugie, pp. 265-278. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 0867-0633 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/62531 | |
dc.language.iso | other | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences | en_ZA |
dc.rights | © 2011 Wszystkie prawa zastrzeżone | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Polemics | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Controversies | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Non-fiction | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Artur Domosławski | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Biography of Ryszard Kapuściński (2010) | en_ZA |
dc.title | Wokół Kapuściński non-fiction. Próba podsumowania i ewaluacji dyskusji | en_ZA |
dc.title.alternative | Around Kapuciñski non-fiction. Evaluating the discussion | en_ZA |
dc.type | Article | en_ZA |