The welfare effects of reversed border tax adjustments as a remedy under unilateral environmental taxation : a South African case study

Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Seymore, Reyno
dc.contributor.author Chitiga-Mabugu, Margaret
dc.contributor.author Van Heerden, J.H. (Jan Horn), 1957-
dc.date.accessioned 2017-01-17T06:13:59Z
dc.date.available 2017-01-17T06:13:59Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.description.abstract Border Tax Adjustments (BTAs) resurfaced recently in national policy debates as a possible measure to counter the anti-competitiveness effect of unilateral environmental taxes. There seems to be no consensus in the literature on the effectiveness of BTAs under environmental taxes. This paper aims firstly to provide a theoretical Heckscher-Ohlin analysis that not only challenges the effectiveness of BTAs, but also proposes an alternative approach to mitigate the welfare effects of environmental taxes. Secondly, the paper evaluate the effectiveness of the alternative approach, to negate the economic impact on competitiveness of an electricity generation tax, without sacrificing the environmental benefits of the tax, in the case of South Africa. Using conventional Heckscher-Ohlin methodology, in a small country, we show that policy makers should, instead of implementing BTAs, consider the opposite of BTAs to mitigate the welfare effects of environmental taxes. We show that gains from trade, due to a reduction in import tariffs, could, under certain assumptions, offset the initial tax induced welfare loss. The paper then applies the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model to evaluate the impact of an electricity generation tax on the South African, SACU and SADC economies and explores the possibility to reduce the economic impact of the electricity generation tax through traditional border tax adjustments. The results show that an electricity generation tax will lead to a contraction of the South African gross domestic product. However, traditional BTAs are unable to address these negative impacts. The paper then test the proposed reversed BTA approach where gains from trade are utilised to negate the negative impacts of an electricity generation tax, while retaining the environmental benefits associated with the electricity generation tax. This is achieved through a reduction in import tariffs, as this reduction will reduce production costs and thereby restore the competitiveness of South Africa. The reduction in import tariffs not only negates the negative GDP impact of the electricity generation tax, but most the CO2 abatement from the electricity generation tax is retained. en_ZA
dc.description.department Economics en_ZA
dc.description.librarian hb2017 en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.multi-science.co.uk/ee.htm en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Seymore, R, Mabugu, M & Van Heerden, JH 2012, 'The welfare effects of reversed border tax adjustments as a remedy under unilateral environmental taxation : a South African case study', Energy and Environment, vol. 23, no. 8, pp.1209-1220. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0958-305X
dc.identifier.other 10.1260/0958-305X.23.8.1209
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/58529
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Multi-Science Publishing en_ZA
dc.rights Multi-Science Publishing en_ZA
dc.subject Welfare effects en_ZA
dc.subject Environmental taxation en_ZA
dc.subject Border tax adjustments (BTAs) en_ZA
dc.subject South Africa (SA) en_ZA
dc.title The welfare effects of reversed border tax adjustments as a remedy under unilateral environmental taxation : a South African case study en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record