False air-bone gaps at 4 kHz in listeners with normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss
Loading...
Date
Authors
Margolis, Robert H.
Eikelboom, Robert H.
Johnson, Chad
Ginter, Samantha M.
Swanepoel, De Wet
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor and Francis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE : This report presents data from four studies to examine standard bone-conduction reference equivalent threshold force levels (RETFL), especially at 4 kHz where anomalous air-bone gaps are common. DESIGN : Data were mined from studies that obtained air- and bone-conduction thresholds from normal-hearing and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) participants, using commercial audiometers and standard audiometric transducers. STUDY SAMPLE : There were 249 normal-hearing and 188 SNHL participants. RESULTS : (1) Normal-hearing participants had small air-bone gaps at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kHz (-1.7 to 0.3 dB) and larger air-bone gaps at 4 kHz (10.6 dB). (2) SNHL participants had small air-bone gaps at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kHz (-0.7 to 1.7 dB) and a larger air-bone gap at 4 kHz (14.1 dB). (3) The 4-kHz air-bone gap grew with air-conduction threshold from 10.1 dB when the air-conduction threshold was 5-10 dB HL to 21.1 dB when the air-conduction threshold was greater than 60 dB. (4) With the 4-kHz RETFL corrected by the average SNHL air-bone gap, the relationship between RETFL and frequency is linear with a slope of - 12 dB per octave. CONCLUSIONS : The 4-kHz air-bone gaps for listeners with SNHL could be avoided by adjusting the 4-kHz RETFL by - 14.1 dB.
Description
Keywords
Audiometry, Automated audiometry, Hearing, Hearing test, Air conduction, Bone conduction, Threshold, Air-bone gap, Artificial mastoid, Reference equivalent threshold force levels (RETFL), Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL)
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Robert H. Margolis, Robert H. Eikelboom, Chad Johnson, Samantha M. Ginter, De Wet Swanepoel & Brian C. J. Moore (2013) False air-bone gaps at 4 kHz in listeners
with normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss, International Journal of Audiology, 52:8, 526-532, DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2013.792437.