dc.contributor.author |
Zimper, Alexander
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-11-30T06:09:43Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-11-30T06:09:43Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011-09 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
In standard models of Bayesian learning agents reduce their uncertainty about
an event s true probability because their consistent estimator concentrates almost
surely around this probability s true value as the number of observations becomes
large. This paper takes the empirically observed violations of Savage s (1954)
sure thing principle seriously and asks whether Bayesian learners with ambiguity
attitudes will reduce their ambiguity when sample information becomes large.
To address this question, I develop closed-form models of Bayesian learning in
which beliefs are described as Choquet estimators with respect to neo-additive
capacities (Chateauneuf, Eichberger, and Grant 2007). Under the optimistic, the
pessimistic, and the full Bayesian update rule, a Bayesian learner s ambiguity will
increase rather than decrease to the e¤ect that these agents will express ambiguity
attitudes regardless of whether they have access to large sample information or
not. While consistent Bayesian learning occurs under the Sarin-Wakker update
rule, this result comes with the descriptive drawback that it does not apply to
agents who still express ambiguity attitudes after one round of updating. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.department |
Economics |
en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian |
hb2016 |
en_ZA |
dc.description.uri |
http://pubsonline.informs.org/journal/deca |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation |
Zimper , A 2011, 'Do Bayesians learn their way out of ambiguity?', Decision Analysis, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 269-285. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn |
1545-8490 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1545-8504 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1287/deca.1110.0217 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/58314 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher |
INFORMS |
en_ZA |
dc.rights |
INFORMS © 2011 |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Non-additive probability measures |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Bayesian learning |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Choquet expected utility theory |
en_ZA |
dc.title |
Do Bayesians learn their way out of ambiguity? |
en_ZA |
dc.type |
Postprint Article |
en_ZA |