Do Bayesians learn their way out of ambiguity?
Loading...
Date
Authors
Zimper, Alexander
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
INFORMS
Abstract
In standard models of Bayesian learning agents reduce their uncertainty about
an event s true probability because their consistent estimator concentrates almost
surely around this probability s true value as the number of observations becomes
large. This paper takes the empirically observed violations of Savage s (1954)
sure thing principle seriously and asks whether Bayesian learners with ambiguity
attitudes will reduce their ambiguity when sample information becomes large.
To address this question, I develop closed-form models of Bayesian learning in
which beliefs are described as Choquet estimators with respect to neo-additive
capacities (Chateauneuf, Eichberger, and Grant 2007). Under the optimistic, the
pessimistic, and the full Bayesian update rule, a Bayesian learner s ambiguity will
increase rather than decrease to the e¤ect that these agents will express ambiguity
attitudes regardless of whether they have access to large sample information or
not. While consistent Bayesian learning occurs under the Sarin-Wakker update
rule, this result comes with the descriptive drawback that it does not apply to
agents who still express ambiguity attitudes after one round of updating.
Description
Keywords
Non-additive probability measures, Bayesian learning, Choquet expected utility theory
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Zimper , A 2011, 'Do Bayesians learn their way out of ambiguity?', Decision Analysis, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 269-285.