Model predictive control strategy of energy-water management in urban households

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wanjiru, Evan M.
dc.contributor.author Zhang, Lijun
dc.contributor.author Xia, Xiaohua
dc.date.accessioned 2016-10-20T12:08:39Z
dc.date.issued 2016-10
dc.description.abstract The management of energy-water nexus in buildings is increasingly gaining attention among domestic end-users. In developing countries, potable water supply is unreliable due to increasing demand, forcing end-users to seek alternative strategies such as pumping and storage in rooftop tanks to reliably meet their water demand. However, this is at an increased cost of energy cost. In this paper, the open loop optimal control model and the closed-loop model predictive control (MPC) model, both with disturbances, are compared while minimizing the maintenance cost of the pump. The open loop optimal model is suitable in instances where only random disturbances due to measurement errors are present. However, in case the demand pattern changes for reasons such as occupancy change in the house, the closed-loop MPC model is suitable as it robustly minimizes the pumping cost while meeting the customer demand. Further, MPC proves its robustness as it is able to overcome the turnpike phenomenon. Each of these two models has their own strengths. The open loop model is cost effective and easy to implement for customers that have a steady demand pattern while the closed-loop MPC model is more robust against demand pattern changes and external disturbances. It is recommended that these two models are adopted according to the specific application. en_ZA
dc.description.department Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering en_ZA
dc.description.embargo 2017-10-31
dc.description.librarian hb2016 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship National Hub for Energy E ciency and Demand Side Management (EEDSM). en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.elsevier.com/locate/apenergy en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Wanjiru, EM, Zhang, LJ & Xia, XH 2016, 'Model predictive control strategy of energy-water management in urban households', Applied Energy, vol. 179, pp. 821-831. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0306-2619 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1872-9118 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.050
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/57390
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Elsevier en_ZA
dc.rights © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Applied Energy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Applied Energy, vol. 179, pp. 821-831, 2016. doi : 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.050. en_ZA
dc.subject Demand management en_ZA
dc.subject Energy-water nexus en_ZA
dc.subject Optimal control en_ZA
dc.subject Time-of-use (TOU) en_ZA
dc.subject Model predictive control (MPC) en_ZA
dc.title Model predictive control strategy of energy-water management in urban households en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record