Potential for economic sustainability of land reform projects benefitting from the Recapitalisation and Development Programme in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Machethe, Charles Lepepeule en
dc.contributor.postgraduate Ntlou, Takatso Faith en
dc.date.accessioned 2016-10-14T07:33:00Z
dc.date.available 2016-10-14T07:33:00Z
dc.date.created 2016-09-01 en
dc.date.issued 2016 en
dc.description Dissertation (MSc Agric)--University of Pretoria, 2016. en
dc.description.abstract Economic sustainability of land reform agricultural projects is considered an essential aspect of food security and economic growth in South Africa. With agriculture identified as an engine of economic growth, especially in the rural areas, it is important that projects benefiting from the Recapitalisation and Development Programme indicate a potential for being economically sustainable when government ceases assistance after the agreed period of support and that they are able to achieve economic sustainability in the long run. The specific purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential for economic sustainability of land reform projects that benefited from the Recapitalisation and Development Programme (RADP, henceforth abbreviated as Recap) from inception in 2010 up to June 2012. This study used survey data from 98 Recap projects. Primary data was collected through face-to-face interviews with the sampled project beneficiaries. Literature on the economic sustainability of farms/projects was reviewed. Recommendations were then drawn on areas of policy intervention to improve economic sustainability of the land reform farms that benefited from Recap. Discriminant function analysis was used to identify factors discriminating potential economically sustainable projects and non-economically sustainable projects. The division was based on income from agricultural production activities generated by the projects. Of the fourteen discriminant variables that were selected, five explained group difference with statistical significance. The five important variables in the discriminant function analysis were: (i) Type of land reform/acquisition (ii) Total amount of Recap grant received (iii) Strategic intervention (mentorship) (iv) Accessibility of the market by the projects; (v) Credit access by the projects. The results of the study indicate that a majority (72%) of the projects that benefited from the Recapitalisation and Development Programme were still not economically sustainable. Low levels of agricultural income were observed in the non-economically sustainable projects and this factor proved to have an effect on the potential to be economically sustainability. Furthermore, this group had more difficulties in accessing markets, especially established ones, and credit, while some of the projects had not received financial assistance yet from Recap. Lack of basic farm management skills was also observed in both groups. It is recommended that the South African Government put more effort into capacitating the beneficiaries through effective skills transfer. The State may also look into providing an enabling environment for the private sector to provide financial services, which are affordable to the beneficiaries. There is a need for the government to establish well-developed markets, which will allow primary producers (beneficiaries) to be linked to value chains where they will have a potential of increasing projects profits. Finally, knowledgeable persons in terms of financing should be involved in the running of the projects, as some of the mentors lack the necessary financial skills, although they do fully understand the production side. en_ZA
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en
dc.description.degree MSc Agric en
dc.description.department Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development en
dc.description.librarian tm2016 en
dc.identifier.citation Ntlou, TF 2016, Potential for economic sustainability of land reform projects benefitting from the Recapitalisation and Development Programme in South Africa, MSc Agric Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/57277> en
dc.identifier.other S2016 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/57277
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher University of Pretoria en_ZA
dc.rights © 2016 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. en
dc.subject UCTD en
dc.subject Economic sustainability
dc.subject Land reform
dc.subject Agricultural projects
dc.subject Recapitalisation and Development Programme (Recap)
dc.subject Rural economic growth
dc.subject Discriminant function analysis
dc.subject Income from agricultural production
dc.subject Market access
dc.subject Credit access
dc.subject Farm management skills
dc.subject Skills transfer
dc.subject Government policy intervention
dc.subject Private sector involvement
dc.subject Mentorship
dc.subject Strategic intervention
dc.subject Agricultural income
dc.subject.other Natural and agricultural sciences theses SDG-01
dc.subject.other SDG-01: No poverty
dc.subject.other Natural and agricultural sciences theses SDG-02
dc.subject.other SDG-02: Zero hunger
dc.subject.other Natural and agricultural sciences theses SDG-04
dc.subject.other SDG-04: Quality education
dc.subject.other Natural and agricultural sciences theses SDG-08
dc.subject.other SDG-08: Decent work and economic growth
dc.subject.other Natural and agricultural sciences theses SDG-09
dc.subject.other SDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructure
dc.subject.other Natural and agricultural sciences theses SDG-10
dc.subject.other SDG-10: Reduced inequalities
dc.title Potential for economic sustainability of land reform projects benefitting from the Recapitalisation and Development Programme in South Africa en_ZA
dc.type Dissertation en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record