Exotic biological control agents : a solution or contribution to arthropod invasions?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hajek, Ann E.
dc.contributor.author Hurley, Brett Phillip
dc.contributor.author Kenis, Marc
dc.contributor.author Garnas, Jeffrey R.
dc.contributor.author Bush, Samantha J.
dc.contributor.author Wingfield, Michael J.
dc.contributor.author Van Lenteren, Joop C.
dc.contributor.author Cock, Matthew J.W.
dc.date.accessioned 2016-07-22T08:51:05Z
dc.date.issued 2016-04
dc.description.abstract Biological control is a valuable and effective strategy for controlling arthropod pests and has been used extensively against invasive arthropods. As one approach for control of invasives, exotic natural enemies from the native range of the pest are introduced to areas where control is needed. Classical biological control began to be used in the late 1800s and its use increased until, beginning in 1983, scientists began raising significant concerns and questions about nontarget and indirect effects that can be caused by these introductions. In recent years, similar issues have been raised about augmentative use of exotic natural enemies. Subsequently, international guidelines, national regulations and scientific methods being used for exotic natural enemies in biological control have changed to require appropriate specificity testing, risk assessment and regulatory oversight before exotic natural enemies can be released. National and international standards aimed at minimizing risk have increased awareness and promoted more careful consideration of the costs and benefits associated with biological control. The barriers to the implementation of classical and augmentative biological control with exotic natural enemies now are sometimes difficult and, as a consequence, the numbers of classical biological control programs and releases have decreased significantly. Based in part on this new, more careful approach, classical biological control programs more recently undertaken are increasingly aimed at controlling especially damaging invasive arthropod pests that otherwise cannot be controlled. We examine evidence for these revised procedures and regulations aimed at increasing success and minimizing risk. We also discuss limitations linked to the apparent paucity of postintroduction monitoring and inherent unpredictability of indirect effects. en_ZA
dc.description.department Microbiology and Plant Pathology en_ZA
dc.description.department Zoology and Entomology en_ZA
dc.description.embargo 2017-04-30
dc.description.librarian hb2016 en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://link.springer.com/journal/10530 en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Hajek, AE, Hurley, BP, Kenis, M, Garnas, JR, Bush, SJ, Wingfield, MJ, Van Lenteren, JC & Cock, MJW 2016, 'Exotic biological control agents : a solution or contribution to arthropod invasions?', Biological Invasions, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 953-969. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1387-3547 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1573-1464 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1007/s10530-016-1075-8
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/56033
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Springer en_ZA
dc.rights © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016. The original publication is available at : http://link.springer.comjournal/10530. en_ZA
dc.subject Exotic biological control agents en_ZA
dc.subject Nontarget effects en_ZA
dc.subject Environmental safety en_ZA
dc.subject Classical biological control en_ZA
dc.subject Augmentative biological control en_ZA
dc.subject Host range en_ZA
dc.title Exotic biological control agents : a solution or contribution to arthropod invasions? en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record