Exotic biological control agents : a solution or contribution to arthropod invasions?

dc.contributor.authorHajek, Ann E.
dc.contributor.authorHurley, Brett Phillip
dc.contributor.authorKenis, Marc
dc.contributor.authorGarnas, Jeffrey R.
dc.contributor.authorBush, Samantha J.
dc.contributor.authorWingfield, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorVan Lenteren, Joop C.
dc.contributor.authorCock, Matthew J.W.
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-22T08:51:05Z
dc.date.issued2016-04
dc.description.abstractBiological control is a valuable and effective strategy for controlling arthropod pests and has been used extensively against invasive arthropods. As one approach for control of invasives, exotic natural enemies from the native range of the pest are introduced to areas where control is needed. Classical biological control began to be used in the late 1800s and its use increased until, beginning in 1983, scientists began raising significant concerns and questions about nontarget and indirect effects that can be caused by these introductions. In recent years, similar issues have been raised about augmentative use of exotic natural enemies. Subsequently, international guidelines, national regulations and scientific methods being used for exotic natural enemies in biological control have changed to require appropriate specificity testing, risk assessment and regulatory oversight before exotic natural enemies can be released. National and international standards aimed at minimizing risk have increased awareness and promoted more careful consideration of the costs and benefits associated with biological control. The barriers to the implementation of classical and augmentative biological control with exotic natural enemies now are sometimes difficult and, as a consequence, the numbers of classical biological control programs and releases have decreased significantly. Based in part on this new, more careful approach, classical biological control programs more recently undertaken are increasingly aimed at controlling especially damaging invasive arthropod pests that otherwise cannot be controlled. We examine evidence for these revised procedures and regulations aimed at increasing success and minimizing risk. We also discuss limitations linked to the apparent paucity of postintroduction monitoring and inherent unpredictability of indirect effects.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentMicrobiology and Plant Pathologyen_ZA
dc.description.departmentZoology and Entomologyen_ZA
dc.description.embargo2017-04-30
dc.description.librarianhb2016en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://link.springer.com/journal/10530en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationHajek, AE, Hurley, BP, Kenis, M, Garnas, JR, Bush, SJ, Wingfield, MJ, Van Lenteren, JC & Cock, MJW 2016, 'Exotic biological control agents : a solution or contribution to arthropod invasions?', Biological Invasions, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 953-969.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1387-3547 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1573-1464 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s10530-016-1075-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/56033
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherSpringeren_ZA
dc.rights© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016. The original publication is available at : http://link.springer.comjournal/10530.en_ZA
dc.subjectExotic biological control agentsen_ZA
dc.subjectNontarget effectsen_ZA
dc.subjectEnvironmental safetyen_ZA
dc.subjectClassical biological controlen_ZA
dc.subjectAugmentative biological controlen_ZA
dc.subjectHost rangeen_ZA
dc.titleExotic biological control agents : a solution or contribution to arthropod invasions?en_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hajek_Exotic_2016.pdf
Size:
865.49 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: