Protective efficacy of recombinant turkey herpes virus (rHVT-H5) and inactivated H5N1 vaccines in commercial Mulard ducks against the highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 clade 2.2.1 virus

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kilany, Walid H.
dc.contributor.author Safwat, Marwa
dc.contributor.author Mohammed, Samy M.
dc.contributor.author Salim, Abdullah
dc.contributor.author Fasina, Folorunso Oludayo
dc.contributor.author Fasanmi, Olubunmi Gabriel
dc.contributor.author Shalaby, Azhar G.
dc.contributor.author Dauphin, Gwenaelle
dc.contributor.author Hassan, Mohammed K.
dc.contributor.author Lubroth, Juan
dc.contributor.author Jobre, Yilma M.
dc.date.accessioned 2016-07-18T08:44:50Z
dc.date.available 2016-07-18T08:44:50Z
dc.date.issued 2016-06-15
dc.description S1 Table. Weekly mean HI titres (log2 ± SD) using A/Swan/Hungary/4999/2006) rHVT/Ag that indicate the immune response to the rHVT-H5 vaccination. S1 Table legend: Different upper case letters in a row denote the presence of statistically significant (p 0.05) differences. Group I (vaccinated with rHVT-H5 vaccine at 1 day old), Group II (vaccinated with inactivated KV-H5 vaccine at 8 days old), Group III (unvaccinated control). en_ZA
dc.description S2 Table. Weekly mean HI titres (log2 ± SD) measured using (A/chicken/Egypt/Q1995D/ 2010) V/H5N1/Ag that indicates the immune response to the KV-H5 vaccination. S2 Table legend: Different upper case letters in a row denote the presence of statistically significant (p 0.05) differences. Group 1 (vaccinated with rHVT-H5 vaccine at 1 day old), Group II (vaccinated with inactivated KV-H5 vaccine at 8 days old), Group III (unvaccinated control). en_ZA
dc.description S3 Table. Weekly mean HI titres (log2 ± SD) measured using (A/chicken/Egypt/128S/2012) C/H5N1/Ag that indicates the immune response to the challenge virus. S3 Table legend: Different upper case letters in a row denote the presence of statistically significant (p 0.05) differences. Group 1 (vaccinated with rHVT-H5 vaccine at 1 day old), Group II (vaccinated with inactivated KV-H5 vaccine at 8 days old), Group III (unvaccinated control). en_ZA
dc.description.abstract In Egypt, ducks kept for commercial purposes constitute the second highest poultry population, at 150 million ducks/year. Hence, ducks play an important role in the introduction and transmission of avian influenza (AI) in the Egyptian poultry population. Attempts to control outbreaks include the use of vaccines, which have varying levels of efficacy and failure. To date, the effects of vaccine efficacy has rarely been determined in ducks. In this study, we evaluated the protective efficacy of a live recombinant vector vaccine based on a turkey Herpes Virus (HVT) expressing the H5 gene from a clade 2.2 H5N1 HPAIV strain (A/Swan/ Hungary/499/2006) (rHVT-H5) and a bivalent inactivated H5N1 vaccine prepared from clade 2.2.1 and 2.2.1.1 H5N1 seeds in Mulard ducks. A 0.3ml/dose subcutaneous injection of rHVT-H5 vaccine was administered to one-day-old ducklings (D1) and another 0.5ml/ dose subcutaneous injection of the inactivated MEFLUVAC was administered at 7 days (D7). Four separate challenge experiments were conducted at Days 21, 28, 35 and 42, in which all the vaccinated ducks were challenged with 106EID50/duck of H5N1 HPAI virus (A/ chicken/Egypt/128s/2012(H5N1) (clade 2.2.1) via intranasal inoculation. Maternal-derived antibody regression and post-vaccination antibody immune responses were monitored weekly. Ducks vaccinated at 21, 28, 35 and 42 days with the rHVT-H5 and MEFLUVAC vaccines were protected against mortality (80%, 80%, 90% and 90%) and (50%, 70%, 80% and 90%) respectively, against challenges with the H5N1 HPAI virus. The amount of viral shedding and shedding rates were lower in the rHVT-H5 vaccine groups than in the MEFLUVAC groups only in the first two challenge experiments. However, the non-vaccinated groups shed significantly more of the virus than the vaccinated groups. Both rHVT-H5 and MEFLUVAC provide early protection, and rHVT-H5 vaccine in particular provides protection against HPAI challenge. en_ZA
dc.description.department Production Animal Studies en_ZA
dc.description.department Veterinary Tropical Diseases en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2016 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship This work was supported by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under a grant (AID-263-IO-11-00001, Mod. #3) and within the framework of OSRO/EGY/101/ USA, which applies to projects jointly implemented by the FAO, GOVS and NLQP. en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.plosone.org en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Kilany WH, Safwat M, Mohammed SM, Salim A, Fasina FO, Fasanmi OG, et al. (2016) Protective Efficacy of Recombinant Turkey Herpes Virus (rHVT-H5) and Inactivated H5N1 Vaccines in Commercial Mulard Ducks against the Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N1 Clade 2.2.1 Virus. PLoS ONE 11(6): e0156747. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156747. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1932-6203
dc.identifier.other 10.1371/journal.pone.0156747
dc.identifier.other 16416667800
dc.identifier.other H-9699-2013
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/55854
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Public Library of Science en_ZA
dc.rights © 2016 Kilany et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. en_ZA
dc.subject Avian influenza en_ZA
dc.subject Egyptian poultry population en_ZA
dc.subject Turkey herpes virus en_ZA
dc.subject Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) en_ZA
dc.subject rHVT-H5 vaccine en_ZA
dc.subject AI
dc.subject THV
dc.title Protective efficacy of recombinant turkey herpes virus (rHVT-H5) and inactivated H5N1 vaccines in commercial Mulard ducks against the highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 clade 2.2.1 virus en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record