Abstract:
In Egypt, ducks kept for commercial purposes constitute the second highest poultry population,
at 150 million ducks/year. Hence, ducks play an important role in the introduction and
transmission of avian influenza (AI) in the Egyptian poultry population. Attempts to control
outbreaks include the use of vaccines, which have varying levels of efficacy and failure. To
date, the effects of vaccine efficacy has rarely been determined in ducks. In this study, we
evaluated the protective efficacy of a live recombinant vector vaccine based on a turkey
Herpes Virus (HVT) expressing the H5 gene from a clade 2.2 H5N1 HPAIV strain (A/Swan/
Hungary/499/2006) (rHVT-H5) and a bivalent inactivated H5N1 vaccine prepared from
clade 2.2.1 and 2.2.1.1 H5N1 seeds in Mulard ducks. A 0.3ml/dose subcutaneous injection
of rHVT-H5 vaccine was administered to one-day-old ducklings (D1) and another 0.5ml/
dose subcutaneous injection of the inactivated MEFLUVAC was administered at 7 days
(D7). Four separate challenge experiments were conducted at Days 21, 28, 35 and 42, in
which all the vaccinated ducks were challenged with 106EID50/duck of H5N1 HPAI virus (A/
chicken/Egypt/128s/2012(H5N1) (clade 2.2.1) via intranasal inoculation. Maternal-derived
antibody regression and post-vaccination antibody immune responses were monitored
weekly. Ducks vaccinated at 21, 28, 35 and 42 days with the rHVT-H5 and MEFLUVAC vaccines
were protected against mortality (80%, 80%, 90% and 90%) and (50%, 70%, 80%
and 90%) respectively, against challenges with the H5N1 HPAI virus. The amount of viral
shedding and shedding rates were lower in the rHVT-H5 vaccine groups than in the MEFLUVAC groups only in the first two challenge experiments. However, the non-vaccinated
groups shed significantly more of the virus than the vaccinated groups. Both rHVT-H5
and MEFLUVAC provide early protection, and rHVT-H5 vaccine in particular provides protection
against HPAI challenge.
Description:
S1 Table. Weekly mean HI titres (log2 ± SD) using A/Swan/Hungary/4999/2006) rHVT/Ag
that indicate the immune response to the rHVT-H5 vaccination. S1 Table legend: Different
upper case letters in a row denote the presence of statistically significant (p 0.05) differences.
Group I (vaccinated with rHVT-H5 vaccine at 1 day old), Group II (vaccinated with inactivated
KV-H5 vaccine at 8 days old), Group III (unvaccinated control).
S2 Table. Weekly mean HI titres (log2 ± SD) measured using (A/chicken/Egypt/Q1995D/
2010) V/H5N1/Ag that indicates the immune response to the KV-H5 vaccination. S2
Table legend: Different upper case letters in a row denote the presence of statistically significant
(p 0.05) differences. Group 1 (vaccinated with rHVT-H5 vaccine at 1 day old), Group II (vaccinated with inactivated KV-H5 vaccine at 8 days old), Group III (unvaccinated control).
S3 Table. Weekly mean HI titres (log2 ± SD) measured using (A/chicken/Egypt/128S/2012)
C/H5N1/Ag that indicates the immune response to the challenge virus. S3 Table legend: Different
upper case letters in a row denote the presence of statistically significant (p 0.05) differences.
Group 1 (vaccinated with rHVT-H5 vaccine at 1 day old), Group II (vaccinated with
inactivated KV-H5 vaccine at 8 days old), Group III (unvaccinated control).