Da Silva v C H Chemicals (Pty) Ltd : fiduciary duties of resigning directors

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Cassim, Maleka Femida

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Juta Law

Abstract

It is a well-entrenched principle of corporate law that a director has a fiduciary duty not to make a secret profit out of his trust, and generally must not place himself in a position in which his duty and self-interest may conflict (Aberdeen Railway Co v Blaikie Bros (1854) 2 Eq Rep 12 461; Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134 (HL); Robinson v Randfontein Gold Mining Co Ltd 1921AD 168; Phillips v Fieldstone Africa (Pty) Ltd 2004 (3) SA 465 (SCA); Bhullar v Bhullar [2003] 2 BCLC 241 (CA);MS Blackman, R D Jooste, G K Everingham, M Larkin, C H Rademeyer & J L Yeats Commentary on the Companies Act Volume 2 (2008) 8-30). This broader principle may be subdivided into two categories, namely the corporate opportunity rule and the no-profit rule.

Description

This article was written by Maleka Femida Cassim before she joined the University of Pretoria.

Keywords

Director, Principle, Profit, Corporate law

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Cassim, MF 2009, 'Da Silva v C H Chemicals (Pty) Ltd : fiduciary duties of resigning directors', South African Law Journal, vol. 126, no. pp. 61-70.