Da Silva v C H Chemicals (Pty) Ltd : fiduciary duties of resigning directors
Loading...
Date
Authors
Cassim, Maleka Femida
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Juta Law
Abstract
It is a well-entrenched principle of corporate law that a director has a
fiduciary duty not to make a secret profit out of his trust, and generally must
not place himself in a position in which his duty and self-interest may conflict
(Aberdeen Railway Co v Blaikie Bros (1854) 2 Eq Rep 12 461; Regal (Hastings)
Ltd v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134 (HL); Robinson v Randfontein Gold Mining Co
Ltd 1921AD 168; Phillips v Fieldstone Africa (Pty) Ltd 2004 (3) SA 465 (SCA);
Bhullar v Bhullar [2003] 2 BCLC 241 (CA);MS Blackman, R D Jooste, G K
Everingham, M Larkin, C H Rademeyer & J L Yeats Commentary on the
Companies Act Volume 2 (2008) 8-30). This broader principle may be
subdivided into two categories, namely the corporate opportunity rule and
the no-profit rule.
Description
This article was written by Maleka Femida Cassim before she joined the University of Pretoria.
Keywords
Director, Principle, Profit, Corporate law
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Cassim, MF 2009, 'Da Silva v C H Chemicals (Pty) Ltd : fiduciary duties of resigning directors', South African Law Journal, vol. 126, no. pp. 61-70.