Da Silva v C H Chemicals (Pty) Ltd : fiduciary duties of resigning directors
dc.contributor.author | Cassim, Maleka Femida | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-06T14:08:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-05-06T14:08:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.description | This article was written by Maleka Femida Cassim before she joined the University of Pretoria. | en_ZA |
dc.description.abstract | It is a well-entrenched principle of corporate law that a director has a fiduciary duty not to make a secret profit out of his trust, and generally must not place himself in a position in which his duty and self-interest may conflict (Aberdeen Railway Co v Blaikie Bros (1854) 2 Eq Rep 12 461; Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134 (HL); Robinson v Randfontein Gold Mining Co Ltd 1921AD 168; Phillips v Fieldstone Africa (Pty) Ltd 2004 (3) SA 465 (SCA); Bhullar v Bhullar [2003] 2 BCLC 241 (CA);MS Blackman, R D Jooste, G K Everingham, M Larkin, C H Rademeyer & J L Yeats Commentary on the Companies Act Volume 2 (2008) 8-30). This broader principle may be subdivided into two categories, namely the corporate opportunity rule and the no-profit rule. | en_ZA |
dc.description.department | Mercantile Law | en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian | am2016 | en_ZA |
dc.description.uri | http://reference.sabinet.co.za/sa_epublication/ju_salj | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Cassim, MF 2009, 'Da Silva v C H Chemicals (Pty) Ltd : fiduciary duties of resigning directors', South African Law Journal, vol. 126, no. pp. 61-70. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 0258-2503 (print) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1996-2177 (online) | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/52516 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | Juta Law | en_ZA |
dc.rights | Juta Law | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Director | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Principle | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Profit | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Corporate law | en_ZA |
dc.title | Da Silva v C H Chemicals (Pty) Ltd : fiduciary duties of resigning directors | en_ZA |
dc.type | Article | en_ZA |