Please note that UPSpace will be offline from 20:00 on 9 May to 06:00 on 10 May (SAST) due to maintenance. We apologise for any inconvenience caused by this.
 

A life-cycle model with ambiguous survival beliefs

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Groneck, Max
Ludwig, Alexander
Zimper, Alexander

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Abstract

Based on a cognitive notion of neo-additive capacities re ecting likelihood in- sensitivity with respect to survival chances, we construct a Choquet Bayesian learning model over the life-cycle that generates a motivational notion of neo- additive survival beliefs expressing ambiguity attitudes. We embed these neo- additive survival beliefs as decision weights in a Choquet expected utility life-cycle consumption model and calibrate it with data on subjective survival beliefs from the Health and Retirement Study. Our quantitative analysis shows that agents with calibrated neo-additive survival beliefs (i) save less than originally planned, (ii) exhibit undersaving at younger ages, and (iii) hold larger amounts of assets in old age than their rational expectations counterparts who correctly assess their survival chances. Our neo-additive life-cycle model can therefore simultaneously accommodate three important empirical ndings on household saving behavior.

Description

Keywords

Bayesian learning, Likelihood insensitivity, Ambiguity, Choquet expected utility, Dynamic inconsistency, Life-cycle hypothesis, Saving puzzles

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Groneck, M, Ludwig, A & Zimper, A 2015, 'A life-cycle model with ambiguous survival beliefs', Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 162, pp. 137-180.