A life-cycle model with ambiguous survival beliefs

dc.contributor.authorGroneck, Max
dc.contributor.authorLudwig, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorZimper, Alexander
dc.contributor.emailalexander.zimper@up.ac.zaen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-08T05:51:39Z
dc.date.issued2016-03
dc.description.abstractBased on a cognitive notion of neo-additive capacities re ecting likelihood in- sensitivity with respect to survival chances, we construct a Choquet Bayesian learning model over the life-cycle that generates a motivational notion of neo- additive survival beliefs expressing ambiguity attitudes. We embed these neo- additive survival beliefs as decision weights in a Choquet expected utility life-cycle consumption model and calibrate it with data on subjective survival beliefs from the Health and Retirement Study. Our quantitative analysis shows that agents with calibrated neo-additive survival beliefs (i) save less than originally planned, (ii) exhibit undersaving at younger ages, and (iii) hold larger amounts of assets in old age than their rational expectations counterparts who correctly assess their survival chances. Our neo-additive life-cycle model can therefore simultaneously accommodate three important empirical ndings on household saving behavior.en_ZA
dc.description.embargo2017-03-31
dc.description.librarianhb2015en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipNetwork for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement (Netspar), the Research Center SAFE, funded by the State of Hessen initiative for research LOEWE, the State North Rhine-Westphalia and Economic Research Southern Africa (ERSA).en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.comen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationGroneck, M, Ludwig, A & Zimper, A 2015, 'A life-cycle model with ambiguous survival beliefs', Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 162, pp. 137-180.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0022-0531 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1095-7235 (online)
dc.identifier.other0.1016/j.jet.2015.12.008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/51709
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherElsevieren_ZA
dc.rights© 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Economic Theory. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 162, pp. 137-180, 2015. doi : 10.1016/j.jet.2015.12.008.en_ZA
dc.subjectBayesian learningen_ZA
dc.subjectLikelihood insensitivityen_ZA
dc.subjectAmbiguityen_ZA
dc.subjectChoquet expected utilityen_ZA
dc.subjectDynamic inconsistencyen_ZA
dc.subjectLife-cycle hypothesisen_ZA
dc.subjectSaving puzzlesen_ZA
dc.titleA life-cycle model with ambiguous survival beliefsen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Groneck_LifeCycle_2016.pdf
Size:
390.06 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: