Predicting stock returns and volatility using consumption-aggregate wealth ratios : a nonlinear approach

Abstract

Recent empirical evidence based on a linear framework tends to suggest that a Markov-switching version of the consumption-aggregate wealth ratio (cayMS), developed to account for structural breaks, is a better predictor of stock returns than the conventional measure (cay)—a finding we confirm as well. Using quarterly data over 1952:Q1–2013:Q3, we however provide statistical evidence that the relationship between stock returns and cay or cayMS is in fact nonlinear. Then, given this evidence of nonlinearity, using a nonparametric Granger causality test, we show that it is in fact cay and not cayMS which is a stronger predictor of not only stock returns, but also volatility.