Neerslag van die metafoor : 'n voorlopige besinning

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Vos, C.J.A. (Casparus Johannes Adam), 1945-
dc.date.accessioned 2007-12-14T04:48:54Z
dc.date.available 2007-12-14T04:48:54Z
dc.date.issued 2007-09
dc.description.abstract This article examines the theoretical basis and the hermeneutical processes which determine the appropriation of the metaphor in religious discourse. Throughout the twentieth century the influence of linguistic philosophy on language has been noted by various philosophers, linguists and theologians. Religious language of the twenty first century is furthermore intensely aware of the fact that linguistic utterances pertaining to God have no realistic external referent. This realisation foregrounds the importance of the metaphor and speaking about God by means of metaphorical language. Metaphors are sparks of imagination, transferring a word from its normal context to an estranged one. Meaning crystallises in the course of a dynamic interaction between two concepts that belong supposedly to unrelated, even hostile domains. Often the meaning of metaphors is uncertain because authors are not explicit about their thoughts. This is especially the case with regards to metaphors in the Bible, because the interpretation of metaphors is influenced by the reader's associative frame of reference. Both authors and readers from Biblical times had a context and a frame of reference vastly different from today. However, the meaning of metaphors is not fixed, on the contrary, numerous new meanings may be mobilised by different readers' associative frame of reference. Because metaphors have a history of human experience, these are living metaphors that make language new and exceed the limits of meaning and association. If conventional metaphors permeate all of human life, thought and action, theological discourse is metaphor par excellence. This article concludes with a challenge to Practical Theology, especially Homiletics, Liturgy and Narrative Pastoral Counselling to treat the metaphor with caution and with awe. A dynamic and interactive relationship between theory and praxis is necessary for the metaphor to function creatively and to induce change. Therefore theory needs to find its home in praxis. en
dc.format.extent 94211 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier.citation Vos, CJA 2007, 'Die neerslag van die metafoor : 'n voorlopige besinning', Dutch Reformed Theological Journal / Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif, vol. 48, no. 3 & 4, pp. 720-729. [http://www.journals.co.za/ej/ejour_ngtt.html] en
dc.identifier.issn 0028-2006
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/4103
dc.language.iso Afrikaans en
dc.publisher Teologiese Fakulteit, Universiteit van Stellenbosch en
dc.rights Teologiese Fakulteit, Universiteit van Stellenbosch en
dc.subject Metafoor afr
dc.subject Non-kognitiwisme afr
dc.subject Mitologiese spreke afr
dc.subject Linguistiese filosofie afr
dc.subject Non cognitivism en
dc.subject Mithological aphorism / saying en
dc.subject.lcsh Metaphor in the Bible en
dc.subject.lcsh Aphorisms and apothegms en
dc.subject.lcsh Myth in the Bible en
dc.subject.lcsh Linguistics -- Philosophy en
dc.title Neerslag van die metafoor : 'n voorlopige besinning en
dc.title.alternative The underlying principles of the metaphor : a preliminary reflection en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record