Standard epidemiological methods to understand and improve Apis mellifera health

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author VanEngelsdorp, Dennis
dc.contributor.author Lengerich, Eugene
dc.contributor.author Spleen, Angela
dc.contributor.author Dainat, Benjamin
dc.contributor.author Cresswell, James
dc.contributor.author Baylis, Kathy
dc.contributor.author Nguyen, Bach Kim
dc.contributor.author Soroker, Victoria
dc.contributor.author Underwood, Robyn
dc.contributor.author Human, Hannelie
dc.contributor.author Le Conte, Yves
dc.contributor.author Saegerman, Claude
dc.date.accessioned 2014-07-09T12:16:08Z
dc.date.available 2014-07-09T12:16:08Z
dc.date.issued 2013-07-16
dc.description.abstract In this paper, we describe the use of epidemiological methods to understand and reduce honey bee morbidity and mortality. Essential terms are presented and defined and we also give examples for their use. Defining such terms as disease, population, sensitivity, and specificity, provides a framework for epidemiological comparisons. The term population, in particular, is quite complex for an organism like the honey bee because one can view “epidemiological unit” as individual bees, colonies, apiaries, or operations. The population of interest must, therefore, be clearly defined. Equations and explanations of how to calculate measures of disease rates in a population are provided. There are two types of study design; observational and experimental. The advantages and limitations of both are discussed. Approaches to calculate and interpret results are detailed. Methods for calculating epidemiological measures such as detection of rare events, associating exposure and disease (Odds Ratio and Relative Risk), and comparing prevalence and incidence are discussed. Naturally, for beekeepers, the adoption of any management system must have economic advantage. We present a means to determine the cost and benefit of the treatment in order determine its net benefit. Lastly, this paper presents a discussion of the use of Hill’s criteria for inferring causal relationships. This framework for judging cause-effect relationships supports a repeatable and quantitative evaluation process at the population or landscape level. Hill’s criteria disaggregate the different kinds of evidence, allowing the scientist to consider each type of evidence individually and objectively, using a quantitative scoring method for drawing conclusions. It is hoped that the epidemiological approach will be more broadly used to study and negate honey bee disease. en_US
dc.description.librarian am2014 en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The COST Action FA0803 en_US
dc.description.uri http://www.ibra.org.uk/ en_US
dc.identifier.citation VANENGELSDORP, D; LENGERICH, E; SPLEEN, A; DAINAT, B; CRESSWELL, J; BAYLISS, K, NGUYEN, K B; SOROKER; V; UNDERWOOD, R; HUMAN, H; LE CONTE, Y; SAEGERMAN, C (2013) Standard epidemiological methods to understand and improve Apis mellifera health. In Dietemann; J D Ellis, P Neumann (Eds) The COLOSS BEEBOOK: Volume II: Standard methods for Apis mellifera pest and pathogen research. Journal of Apicultural Research 52(4): http://dx.DOI.org/ 10.3896/IBRA.1.52.4.15. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0021-8839
dc.identifier.other 10.3896/IBRA.1.52.4.15
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/40684
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher International Bee Research Association en_US
dc.rights © IBRA 2013 en_US
dc.subject COLOSS en_US
dc.subject BEEBOOK en_US
dc.subject Epidemiology en_US
dc.subject Disease en_US
dc.subject Case definition confidence interval en_US
dc.subject Odds ratio en_US
dc.subject Relative risk en_US
dc.subject Hills Criteria en_US
dc.subject Honeybee (Apis mellifera) en_US
dc.title Standard epidemiological methods to understand and improve Apis mellifera health en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record