Vonnisbespreking : Hoe om ’n komparant se brouwerk reg te maak
Loading...
Date
Authors
Lotz, Johan
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
LitNet
Abstract
Contrary to the common intention of a transferor (Schmidt) and transferee (Innova), an entire erf, instead of a subdivided portion of it, was transferred to Innova. This mistake was later discovered in the course of the liquidation process of Innova. During Schmidt's application to rectify the mistake, and in seeking clarification on the ownership of the remaining extent of said erf, it was unsuccessfully contended that Schmidt was not entitled to any legal assistance in this respect, as his claim has prescribed; alternatively, he was estopped from any relief. The Supreme Court of Appeal again, indubitably, confirmed that the abstract theory applies to the passing of ownership. Consequently it was held that since neither Schmidt nor Innova, respectively, had the intention to transfer and obtain ownership of the remaining extent of the erf, Innova had never become the owner of it. The Supreme Court of Appeal further held that there is no difference between the rectification of a contract on the one hand and the rectification of a deed of transfer on the other. It follows that the rectification of both a contract and deed of transfer does not constitute a "debt" as contemplated by section 10 of the Prescription Act 68 of 1969 which could be extinguished by prescription. An additional technical question concerning the procedure to be applied to rectify the incorrect deed of transfer was also introduced. Even though the Supreme Court of Appeal approved an amendment in terms of section 4(1)(b) of the Deeds Registries Act 47 of 1937 (the act) in order to correct the mistake, the deeds community, especially through the Deeds Office intranet and grapevine, was notably sceptical about this ruling. For this purpose a detailed analysis is prepared to facilitate the various methods that may be applied to correct a defective deed of transfer. The possibilities investigated relate to an amendment in terms of section 4(1)(b) of the act, cancellation of a deed of transfer according to section 6, a section 3(1)(v) endorsement and a rectification transfer.
Description
Keywords
Abstract system of ownership, Appearer, Back session, Cancellation of faulty title, Cash sale, Causal system, Causation test, Conveyancer certificate, Condition of title, Deeds registration process, Deeds registration system, Deeds Registries Act 47 of 1937, Delictual liability, Derivative property acquisition, Endorsement, Estoppel, Factual causation, Formalities, Legal causation, Liability, Marital status, Matrimonial property system, Misrepresentation, Mother title deed, Obligatory agreement, Original transfer of ownership, Out-and-out session, Prenuptial agreement, Preparation clause, Real agreement, Rectification of contact, Rectification of title deed, Registrar circulars, Registrar of deeds, Registration error, Sale in execution, Sections 10, 11 of the Prescription Act 68 of 1969, Section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981, Section 21 of the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984, Sections 3(1)(v), 39, 4(1)(b) and 6 of the Deeds Registries Act 47 of 1937, Subdivision of Agricultural Land Act 70 of 1970, Surveyor-general, Transfer Duty Act 40 of 1949, Aanspreeklikheid, Abstrakte stelsel van eiendomsoorgang, Afgeleide eiendomsverkryging, Akteregistrasiestelsel, Akteregistrasieproses, Aktevervaardiger-sertifikaat, Artikels 10, 11 van die Verjaringswet 68 van 1969, Artikel 2(1) van die Wet op Vervreemding van Grond 68 van 1981, Artikel 21 van die Wet op Huweliksgoedere 88 van 1984, Artikels 3(1)(v), 39, 4(1)(b), 6 van die Registrasie van Aktes Wet 47 van 1937, De duobus vel pluribus reis debendi, Deliktuele aanspreeklikheid, Eiendomsoorgang, Eksekusieverkoping, Endossement, Estoppel, Feitelike kousaliteit, Formaliteitsvoorskrifte, Huweliksgoederebedeling, Huwelik-status, Huweliksvoorwaardeskontrak, Juridiese kousaliteit, Kansellasie van foutiewe titelakte, Komparant, Kontantkoop, Kousale stelsel, Kousaliteitstoets, Landmeter-generaal, Moedertitelakte, Nemo plus iuris ad alium transferre potest quam ipse haberet, Oorspronklike wyse van eiendomsverkryging, Opmetingswet 9 van 1927, Opstelklousule, Registrasiefout, Registrateur van aktes, Registrateursomsendbriewe, Regstellingstransport, Rei vindicatio, Rektifikasie van kontrak, Rektifikasie van titelakte, Res in commercio, Saaklike ooreenkoms, Skynverwekking, Terugsessie, Titelvoorwaardes, Uit-en-uit sessie, Verbintenisskeppende ooreenkoms, Verbintenisskeppende verpligting, Wanvoorstelling, Wet op Hereregte 40 van 1949, Wet op Onderverdeling van Landbougrond 70 van 197
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Lotz, J 2013, 'Vonnisbespreking : Hoe om ’n komparant se brouwerk reg te maak', LitNet Akademies, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 53-67.