Vonnisbespreking : Hoe om ’n komparant se brouwerk reg te maak

dc.contributor.authorLotz, Johan
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-06T09:17:42Z
dc.date.available2014-06-06T09:17:42Z
dc.date.issued2013-12
dc.description.abstractContrary to the common intention of a transferor (Schmidt) and transferee (Innova), an entire erf, instead of a subdivided portion of it, was transferred to Innova. This mistake was later discovered in the course of the liquidation process of Innova. During Schmidt's application to rectify the mistake, and in seeking clarification on the ownership of the remaining extent of said erf, it was unsuccessfully contended that Schmidt was not entitled to any legal assistance in this respect, as his claim has prescribed; alternatively, he was estopped from any relief. The Supreme Court of Appeal again, indubitably, confirmed that the abstract theory applies to the passing of ownership. Consequently it was held that since neither Schmidt nor Innova, respectively, had the intention to transfer and obtain ownership of the remaining extent of the erf, Innova had never become the owner of it. The Supreme Court of Appeal further held that there is no difference between the rectification of a contract on the one hand and the rectification of a deed of transfer on the other. It follows that the rectification of both a contract and deed of transfer does not constitute a "debt" as contemplated by section 10 of the Prescription Act 68 of 1969 which could be extinguished by prescription. An additional technical question concerning the procedure to be applied to rectify the incorrect deed of transfer was also introduced. Even though the Supreme Court of Appeal approved an amendment in terms of section 4(1)(b) of the Deeds Registries Act 47 of 1937 (the act) in order to correct the mistake, the deeds community, especially through the Deeds Office intranet and grapevine, was notably sceptical about this ruling. For this purpose a detailed analysis is prepared to facilitate the various methods that may be applied to correct a defective deed of transfer. The possibilities investigated relate to an amendment in terms of section 4(1)(b) of the act, cancellation of a deed of transfer according to section 6, a section 3(1)(v) endorsement and a rectification transfer.en_US
dc.description.librarianam2014en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.litnet.co.za/cgi-bin/giga.cgi?cmd=cause_dir_news&cat=201&cause_id=1270en_US
dc.identifier.citationLotz, J 2013, 'Vonnisbespreking : Hoe om ’n komparant se brouwerk reg te maak', LitNet Akademies, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 53-67.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1995-5928
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/40043
dc.language.isoAfrikaansen_US
dc.publisherLitNeten_US
dc.rightsLitNeten_US
dc.subjectAbstract system of ownershipen_US
dc.subjectAppeareren_US
dc.subjectBack sessionen_US
dc.subjectCancellation of faulty titleen_US
dc.subjectCash saleen_US
dc.subjectCausal systemen_US
dc.subjectCausation testen_US
dc.subjectConveyancer certificateen_US
dc.subjectCondition of titleen_US
dc.subjectDeeds registration processen_US
dc.subjectDeeds registration systemen_US
dc.subjectDeeds Registries Act 47 of 1937en_US
dc.subjectDelictual liabilityen_US
dc.subjectDerivative property acquisitionen_US
dc.subjectEndorsementen_US
dc.subjectEstoppelen_US
dc.subjectFactual causationen_US
dc.subjectFormalitiesen_US
dc.subjectLegal causationen_US
dc.subjectLiabilityen_US
dc.subjectMarital statusen_US
dc.subjectMatrimonial property systemen_US
dc.subjectMisrepresentationen_US
dc.subjectMother title deeden_US
dc.subjectObligatory agreementen_US
dc.subjectOriginal transfer of ownershipen_US
dc.subjectOut-and-out sessionen_US
dc.subjectPrenuptial agreementen_US
dc.subjectPreparation clauseen_US
dc.subjectReal agreementen_US
dc.subjectRectification of contacten_US
dc.subjectRectification of title deeden_US
dc.subjectRegistrar circularsen_US
dc.subjectRegistrar of deedsen_US
dc.subjectRegistration erroren_US
dc.subjectSale in executionen_US
dc.subjectSections 10, 11 of the Prescription Act 68 of 1969en_US
dc.subjectSection 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981en_US
dc.subjectSection 21 of the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984en_US
dc.subjectSections 3(1)(v), 39, 4(1)(b) and 6 of the Deeds Registries Act 47 of 1937en_US
dc.subjectSubdivision of Agricultural Land Act 70 of 1970en_US
dc.subjectSurveyor-generalen_US
dc.subjectTransfer Duty Act 40 of 1949en_US
dc.subjectAanspreeklikheiden_US
dc.subjectAbstrakte stelsel van eiendomsoorgangen_US
dc.subjectAfgeleide eiendomsverkrygingen_US
dc.subjectAkteregistrasiestelselen_US
dc.subjectAkteregistrasieprosesen_US
dc.subjectAktevervaardiger-sertifikaaten_US
dc.subjectArtikels 10, 11 van die Verjaringswet 68 van 1969en_US
dc.subjectArtikel 2(1) van die Wet op Vervreemding van Grond 68 van 1981en_US
dc.subjectArtikel 21 van die Wet op Huweliksgoedere 88 van 1984en_US
dc.subjectArtikels 3(1)(v), 39, 4(1)(b), 6 van die Registrasie van Aktes Wet 47 van 1937en_US
dc.subjectDe duobus vel pluribus reis debendien_US
dc.subjectDeliktuele aanspreeklikheiden_US
dc.subjectEiendomsoorgangen_US
dc.subjectEksekusieverkopingen_US
dc.subjectEndossementen_US
dc.subjectEstoppelen_US
dc.subjectFeitelike kousaliteiten_US
dc.subjectFormaliteitsvoorskrifteen_US
dc.subjectHuweliksgoederebedelingen_US
dc.subjectHuwelik-statusen_US
dc.subjectHuweliksvoorwaardeskontraken_US
dc.subjectJuridiese kousaliteiten_US
dc.subjectKansellasie van foutiewe titelakteen_US
dc.subjectKomparanten_US
dc.subjectKontantkoopen_US
dc.subjectKousale stelselen_US
dc.subjectKousaliteitstoetsen_US
dc.subjectLandmeter-generaalen_US
dc.subjectMoedertitelakteen_US
dc.subjectNemo plus iuris ad alium transferre potest quam ipse habereten_US
dc.subjectOorspronklike wyse van eiendomsverkrygingen_US
dc.subjectOpmetingswet 9 van 1927en_US
dc.subjectOpstelklousuleen_US
dc.subjectRegistrasiefouten_US
dc.subjectRegistrateur van aktesen_US
dc.subjectRegistrateursomsendbrieween_US
dc.subjectRegstellingstransporten_US
dc.subjectRei vindicatioen_US
dc.subjectRektifikasie van kontraken_US
dc.subjectRektifikasie van titelakteen_US
dc.subjectRes in commercioen_US
dc.subjectSaaklike ooreenkomsen_US
dc.subjectSkynverwekkingen_US
dc.subjectTerugsessieen_US
dc.subjectTitelvoorwaardesen_US
dc.subjectUit-en-uit sessieen_US
dc.subjectVerbintenisskeppende ooreenkomsen_US
dc.subjectVerbintenisskeppende verpligtingen_US
dc.subjectWanvoorstellingen_US
dc.subjectWet op Hereregte 40 van 1949en_US
dc.subjectWet op Onderverdeling van Landbougrond 70 van 197en_US
dc.titleVonnisbespreking : Hoe om ’n komparant se brouwerk reg te maaken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lotz_Vonnisbespreking_2013.pdf
Size:
122.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: