Production of toxic pavettamine and pavettamine conjugates in the gousiekte-causing Fadogia homblei plant and its relation to the bacterial endosymbiont

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Van Elst, Daan
Van Wyk, Braam
Schultz, Anitra
Prinsen, Els

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Abstract

Plant poisoning of livestock is responsible for considerable economic losses in southern Africa. Six plant species of the Rubiaceae family are known to cause gousiekte, a cardiac syndrome of ruminants induced by ingestion of the toxic compound pavettamine. Progress in understanding the aetiology of this disease is largely hampered by the variable toxicity of the plants and the absence of a quantification method for pavettamine. The pavettamine concentration in leaf samples of Fadogia homblei, a known gousiekte causing plant, was analyzed by massspectrometry. In the most apical leaf pair, the highest concentration of pavettamine was detected. Distal leaves contained progressively less pavettamine. Besides a significant amount of free pavettamine, most pavettamine was found to occur in a conjugated form. To which molecules the pavettamine is conjugated remains unknown as is the function of conjugated pavettamine in the development of gousiekte. All know gousiekte-causing plants contain symbiotic bacteria in their leaves; it was hypothesized that these bacteria might be involved in the production of pavettamine. However, analysis of in vitro cultures of the Fadogia homblei endosymbiont revealed no production of pavettamine. Pavettamine is therefore not produced by the bacteria alone. It is either the product of the interaction with the plant or solely produced by the host.

Description

Keywords

Fadogia homblei, Rubiaceae, Burkholderia, Endosymbiont, Mass-spectrometry, Pavettamine, Gousiekte

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Van Elst, D, Van Wyk, B, Schultz, A & Prinsen, E 2013, 'Production of toxic pavettamine and pavettamine conjugates in the gousiekte-causing Fadogia homblei plant and its relation to the bacterial endosymbiont', Phytochemistry, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 92-98.