The exceptio doli generalis – back again?

Veldsman, Lenee; Kuschke, Birgit

dc.contributor.author	Veldsman, Lenee
dc.contributor.author	Kuschke, Birgit
dc.date.accessioned	2012-10-22T06:47:24Z
dc.date.available	2013-10-31T00:20:04Z
dc.date.issued	2012-05
dc.description.abstract	Before it was abolished in 1988 (the court in Bank of Lisbon and South Africa v De Ornelas 1988 (3) 580 (A) held that the exceptio should never have been accepted as part of our law), a party to a contract could avoid contractual liability based on the bad faith (in other words the reprehensible or unconscionable conduct of the other party to the contract) by raising a specific defence, the exceptio doli generalis (exceptio doli).	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Veldsman, L & Kuschke, B 2012, 'The exceptio doli generalis – back again?', Without Prejudice, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 47-49.	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1681-178X
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2263/20245
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	JetBlue	en_US
dc.rights	JetBlue	en_US
dc.subject	Doli generalis	en_US
dc.title	The exceptio doli generalis – back again?	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US