dc.contributor.author |
Rautenbach, Christa
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Van der Linde, Anton
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2012-04-16T06:09:50Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2012-07-31T00:20:03Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2012 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This note discusses some remarks made in Radebe v Sosibo NO 2011 (5) SA 51 (GSJ) (hereafter the Radebe case) - a matter heard on appeal in the South Gauteng High Court. The case dealt, in essence, with the question whether a contextual reading of a 'property exclusion clause' in an antenuptial contract could be construed as a valid pactum successorium (succession agreement or pactum de succendo) when one of the parties to the contract died intestate. |
en |
dc.description.librarian |
nf2012 |
en |
dc.description.uri |
http://www.jutalaw.co.za/catalogue/itemdisplay.jsp?item_id=3601 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Rautenbach, C & Van der Linde, A 2012, 'The requirements for a valid pactum successorium in an antenuptial contract : the curious case of Radebe v Sosibo NO', South African Law Journal, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 22-32. |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0258-2503 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/18571 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Juta Law |
en_US |
dc.rights |
Juta Law. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Radebe v Sosibo NO 2011 (5) SA 51 (GSJ) |
en |
dc.subject |
Succession agreement |
en |
dc.subject |
Pactum successorium |
la |
dc.subject |
Antenuptial contract |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Prenuptial agreements |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Power of attorney |
en |
dc.title |
Requirements for a valid pactum successorium in an antenuptial contract : the curious case of Radebe v Sosibo NO |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |