Requirements for a valid pactum successorium in an antenuptial contract : the curious case of Radebe v Sosibo NO
dc.contributor.author | Rautenbach, Christa | |
dc.contributor.author | Van der Linde, Anton | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-04-16T06:09:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-31T00:20:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.description.abstract | This note discusses some remarks made in Radebe v Sosibo NO 2011 (5) SA 51 (GSJ) (hereafter the Radebe case) - a matter heard on appeal in the South Gauteng High Court. The case dealt, in essence, with the question whether a contextual reading of a 'property exclusion clause' in an antenuptial contract could be construed as a valid pactum successorium (succession agreement or pactum de succendo) when one of the parties to the contract died intestate. | en |
dc.description.librarian | nf2012 | en |
dc.description.uri | http://www.jutalaw.co.za/catalogue/itemdisplay.jsp?item_id=3601 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Rautenbach, C & Van der Linde, A 2012, 'The requirements for a valid pactum successorium in an antenuptial contract : the curious case of Radebe v Sosibo NO', South African Law Journal, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 22-32. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0258-2503 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/18571 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Juta Law | en_US |
dc.rights | Juta Law. | en_US |
dc.subject | Radebe v Sosibo NO 2011 (5) SA 51 (GSJ) | en |
dc.subject | Succession agreement | en |
dc.subject | Pactum successorium | la |
dc.subject | Antenuptial contract | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Prenuptial agreements | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Power of attorney | en |
dc.title | Requirements for a valid pactum successorium in an antenuptial contract : the curious case of Radebe v Sosibo NO | en |
dc.type | Article | en |