Abstract:
This article canvassed Greek and Roman sources for discussions concerning truth talk and
lies. It has investigated what social historians and/or anthropologists are saying about truth
talking and lying and has developed a model that will examine the issue of truth and lying in
socio-religious terms as defined by the Graeco-Roman sources. The article tracked down the
socio-rhetorical force of truth talk and lies, in terms of how they are strategically deployed to
negotiate authority, to exert epistemic control, to define a personal and communal identity and
to defend innovation in the midst of competing truth claims. It focused on the New Testament
writing (1 John) and demonstrated that the author, in his desire to establish and defend his
vision of truth, resorts to a style of truth talk endemic to the literary habits of Graeco-Roman
antiquity. In so doing, the author established himself as a credible witness, set himself apart
from those propounding falsehoods and, to some extent, distanced himself from the vision of
truth propounded in the Gospel of John.
