Identifying priority areas for ecosystem service management in South African grasslands

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Egoh, Benis N.
dc.contributor.author Reyers, Belinda
dc.contributor.author Rouget, Mathieu
dc.contributor.author Richardson, D.M. (David Mark), 1958-
dc.date.accessioned 2011-03-07T06:34:38Z
dc.date.available 2011-03-07T06:34:38Z
dc.date.issued 2011-01
dc.description.abstract Grasslands provide many ecosystem services required to support human well-being and are home to a diverse fauna and flora. Degradation of grasslands due to agriculture and other forms of land use threaten biodiversity and ecosystem services. Various efforts are underway around the world to stem these declines. The Grassland Programme in South Africa is one such initiative and is aimed at safeguarding both biodiversity and ecosystem services. As part of this developing programme, we identified spatial priority areas for ecosystem services, tested the effect of different target levels of ecosystem services used to identify priority areas, and evaluated whether biodiversity priority areas can be aligned with those for ecosystem services. We mapped five ecosystem services (below ground carbon storage, surface water supply, water flow regulation, soil accumulation and soil retention) and identified priority areas for individual ecosystem services and for all five services at the scale of quaternary catchments. Planning for individual ecosystem services showed that, depending on the ecosystem service of interest, between 4% and 13% of the grassland biome was required to conserve at least 40% of the soil and water services. Thirty-four percent of the biome was needed to conserve 40% of the carbon service in the grassland. Priority areas identified for five ecosystem services under three target levels (20%, 40%, 60% of the total amount) showed that between 17% and 56% of the grassland biome was needed to conserve these ecosystem services. There was moderate to high overlap between priority areas selected for ecosystem services and already-identified terrestrial and freshwater biodiversity priority areas. This level of overlap coupled with low irreplaceability values obtained when planning for individual ecosystem services makes it possible to combine biodiversity and ecosystem services in one plan using systematic conservation planning. en
dc.identifier.citation Egoh, B.N., et al., Identifying priority areas for ecosystem service management in South African grasslands, Journal of Environmental Management (2011), doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.019 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0301-4797
dc.identifier.other 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.019
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/15971
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.rights © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.subject Human wellbeing en
dc.subject Sustainable land-use en
dc.subject Grassland biomes en
dc.subject.lcsh Ecosystem services -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Natural resources -- South Africa -- Management en
dc.subject.lcsh Biodiversity conservation -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Biotic communities -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Grassland conservation -- South Africa en
dc.title Identifying priority areas for ecosystem service management in South African grasslands en_US
dc.type Postprint Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record