National Credit Regulator versus Nedbank Ltd and the practice of debt counselling in South Africa

De Villiers, D.W. (Dawid Willem)

dc.contributor.author	De Villiers, D.W. (Dawid Willem)
dc.date.accessioned	2011-01-12T10:24:06Z
dc.date.available	2011-01-12T10:24:06Z
dc.date.issued	2010
dc.description.abstract	The implementation of debt review mechanisms provided for in Sections 86 and 87 of the NCA led to conflicting views, as expressed by debt counsellors, the Regulator, the major banks and magistrates. Uncertainty and confusion with regard to the proper interpretation of these two sections of the NCA followed. Contradictory decisions given by magistrates also hindered the effective application of the NCA as regards debt restructuring. It was even possible that there were serious shortcomings in the NCA itself, which should be addressed by appropriate amendments of the Act.	en
dc.identifier.citation	De Villiers, DW 2010, 'National Credit Regulator versus Nedbank Ltd and the practice of debt counselling in South Africa', Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 128-160. [http://www.puk.ac.za/fakulteite/regte/per/index.html]	en
dc.identifier.issn	1727-3781
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2263/15724
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Faculty of Law, North West University	en_US
dc.rights	Faculty of Law, North West University	en
dc.subject	Debt counselling	en
dc.subject.lcsh	National Credit Regulator (South Africa)	en
dc.subject.lcsh	Nedbank Limited	en
dc.subject.lcsh	Practice of law -- South Africa	en
dc.subject.lcsh	South Africa. National Credit Act, 2005	en
dc.title	National Credit Regulator versus Nedbank Ltd and the practice of debt counselling in South Africa	en
dc.type	Article	en