The normative acceptability of SAAS 320 audit materiality

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Botha, W.J.J. (Willem Johannes Jacobus)
dc.date.accessioned 2010-09-13T07:11:12Z
dc.date.available 2010-09-13T07:11:12Z
dc.date.issued 2000
dc.description.abstract The process by which an organisation's financial statements are audited by external auditors can be described as a risk-based, systematic approach in which the nature, extent and timing of the audit procedures and audit evidence required, are determined by assessing and evaluating the risk that the financial statement assertions are materiality misstated. In fact, when the external auditor issues a standard unqualified audit report on the financial statements, he/she is confirming, with a high degree of assurance based on persuasive evidence gathered during the audit, that the financial statements are free of material misrepresentations, taking cognisance of the fact that the financial statements are presented in accordance with a specified set(s) of criteria. en
dc.identifier.citation Botha, W 2000, 'The normative acceptability of SAAS 320 audit materiality', Auditing SA, pp. 20-22. [http://www.saiga.co.za/publications-auditingsa.htm] en
dc.identifier.issn 1028-9003
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/14824
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Southern African Institute of Government Auditors en_US
dc.rights Southern African Institute of Government Auditors en_US
dc.subject Audit materiality en
dc.subject External audit en
dc.subject.lcsh Materiality (Accounting) -- Risk assessment en
dc.subject.lcsh Audited financial statements en
dc.title The normative acceptability of SAAS 320 audit materiality en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record