Conflicting P–T paths within the Central Zone of the Limpopo Belt : a consequence of different thermobarometric methods?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Rigby, Martin J.
dc.date.accessioned 2009-09-16T13:17:11Z
dc.date.available 2009-09-16T13:17:11Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.description.abstract A single metapelitic sample from the Verbaard locality, near Messina was investigated in order to construct a P–T path and moreover, highlight pertinent contradictions in the current P–T database. Interpretations based on P–T pseudosections, garnet isopleth thermobarometry and mineral mode/isopleth modelling indicate that the mineral assemblages, textures and zonations developed in the metapelite formed along a single clockwise P–T path. The metamorphic evolution is characterized by an early high-pressure phase at 10–11 kbar/800°C, followed by a simultaneous pressure decrease and temperature increase to ~8/850 °C and subsequent retrogression via decompression-cooling to 4–5 kbar at T < 650°C. Growth zoning in garnet provides evidence for an earlier, prograde history, however, as potential melt-loss was not accounted for this must be deemed speculative. The results of this study agree entirely with that of [Zeh, A., Klemd, R., Buhlmann, S., Barton, J.M. 2004. Pro- and retrograde P–T evolution of granulites of the Beit Bridge Complex (Limpopo Belt, South Africa); constraints from quantitative phase diagrams and geotectonic implications. Journal of Metamorphic Geology 22, 79–95], who adopted a similar approach to thermobarometry i.e. pseudosections. The results are, however, inconsistent with recent publications that argue for a twofold, metamorphic history defined by two decompression-cooling paths (DC1 ~2.6 Ga and DC2 ~2.0 Ga) that are separated by an isobaric heating path (~2.0 Ga). The disparity in the results obtained from different workers can be explained by an examination of the thermobarometric methods employed. The methodology employed to derive the twofold, polymetamorphic P–T path appears to be erroneous. At present, the most reliable and robust method for determining P–T paths is the pseudosection approach to thermobarometry. Future modelling of Limpopo Belt granulites should adopt this strategy and ensure potential melt-loss is taken into account. Alternatively, this potential problem can be avoided altogether by investigating rocks of mafic composition. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Rigby, M.J. Conflicting P–T paths within the Central Zone of the Limpopo Belt: A consequence of different thermobarometric methods?. J. Afr. Earth Sci. (2009), doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2009.03.005 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1464-343X
dc.identifier.other 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2009.03.005
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/11276
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.rights Elsevier en_US
dc.subject Thermobarometry en_US
dc.subject Pseudosections en_US
dc.subject P-T paths en_US
dc.subject Limpopo belt en_US
dc.subject Metamorphism en_US
dc.title Conflicting P–T paths within the Central Zone of the Limpopo Belt : a consequence of different thermobarometric methods? en_US
dc.type Postprint Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record